|
-
February 5th, 2002, 07:30 PM
#1
 AO website offline
Most of you people noticed that AO was offline for many hours today. Seems there were som problems with the database. Now I wonder, what happend and is it going to happen again? Does anybody know?
-
February 5th, 2002, 07:34 PM
#2
Yea, I was wondering about that.... JP?
An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure...
 
-
February 5th, 2002, 07:53 PM
#3
I saw it down with the DB probs between 8am and 3pm (GMT)
A very boring day without AO!
Glad it's back
J.
-
February 5th, 2002, 08:43 PM
#4
I just couldn't reach AOfor about 20 minutes. So what's up?
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
-
February 5th, 2002, 08:48 PM
#5
I heard someone in #antionline say that JP took it offline because it was under DOS-attack... dunno if that's true, could be an explanation though...
I wish to express my gratitude to the people of Italy. Thank you for inventing pizza.
-
February 5th, 2002, 08:54 PM
#6
Doesn't surprise me if it's true. Damn kiddies.
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
-
February 5th, 2002, 08:55 PM
#7
I noticed some trouble also. I ran a traceroute:
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 172.16.32.2
2 <10 ms * <10 ms 88.2.0.99
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-gw5-orl-5-0-0-TS23.sprintlink.net [160.81.120
181]
5 10 ms 30 ms 10 ms sl-bb20-orl-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.2.217]
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 20 ms 30 ms 50 ms 180.at-5-1-0.XR2.ATL5.ALTER.NET [152.63.82.210]
9 30 ms 30 ms 20 ms 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.ATL5.ALTER.NET [152.63.85.193]
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 140 ms 231 ms 230 ms 0.so-7-0-0.TL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.146.42]
12 50 ms * * 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.38.74]
13 60 ms 50 ms 40 ms POS7-0.GW1.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.32.225]
14 cisco2611.antionline.net [63.108.181.193] reports: Destination net unreach
able.
Trace complete.
-
February 5th, 2002, 08:59 PM
#8
Originally posted by antihaxor
I noticed some trouble also. I ran a traceroute:
1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 172.16.32.2
2 <10 ms * <10 ms 88.2.0.99
3 * * * Request timed out.
4 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-gw5-orl-5-0-0-TS23.sprintlink.net [160.81.120
181]
5 10 ms 30 ms 10 ms sl-bb20-orl-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.2.217]
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 20 ms 30 ms 50 ms 180.at-5-1-0.XR2.ATL5.ALTER.NET [152.63.82.210]
9 30 ms 30 ms 20 ms 0.so-1-0-0.XL2.ATL5.ALTER.NET [152.63.85.193]
10 * * * Request timed out.
11 140 ms 231 ms 230 ms 0.so-7-0-0.TL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.146.42]
12 50 ms * * 0.so-6-0-0.XL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.38.74]
13 60 ms 50 ms 40 ms POS7-0.GW1.DCA6.ALTER.NET [152.63.32.225]
14 cisco2611.antionline.net [63.108.181.193] reports: Destination net unreach
able.
Trace complete.
That what it looks like all the time.
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
-
February 5th, 2002, 10:03 PM
#9
/antihaxor shrugs and sez:
EXACTLY..the trouble is not a Ddos attack. Thats why I put it up once NO NEED FOR THE REPEAT I think mine is clear enough *sheesh*
-
February 5th, 2002, 10:09 PM
#10
That's not a problem. Sheesh yourself. Do you know networking?
I don't respond to traces or pings, but that doesn't mean I don't work. DOH!
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
