-
February 13th, 2002, 05:16 PM
#1
Comcast Admits to spying on it's customers
In a slick spindoctoring of the issue they claim its for "customer service". This is where the line should be drawn. They even admit they can store any bank account# and PIN. This is a little diffrent than redirecting a client to an appropiate server like Oblio was complaining about a couple of days ago. This is your isp storing everything you do. Comcast is the #3 isp in the world by the way.
-
February 13th, 2002, 05:51 PM
#2
I've seen commercials (for Earthlink I think) in which they promise not track you. Earthlink as the right idea. Hopfully Comcast drops this obnoxious practice -before they buy out ATT broadband service
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What\'s more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke
-
February 13th, 2002, 06:04 PM
#3
this kinda thing makes u sick doesn't it....
ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI.
When in Russia, pet a PETSCII.
Get your ass over to SLAYRadio the best station for C64 Remixes !
-
February 13th, 2002, 10:02 PM
#4
There's a couple of lawsuits waiting to happen. Wait till the consumer advocacy groups get a hold of this.......
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
-
February 13th, 2002, 10:25 PM
#5
Comcast just announced that they will stop doing this. See http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...s__data&cid=70
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What\'s more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke
-
February 13th, 2002, 10:41 PM
#6
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
-
February 13th, 2002, 10:42 PM
#7
Sounds to me like this is just a simple case of (transparent) proxying and caching... This is not anything new... Caching is a widespread solution for accelerrating web browsing; Your workplace network most likely uses a proxy and noone's made a big deal out of it... Besides, unless they've done something really twisted (which would include sofisticated man-in-the-middle attacks), the proxying does NOT cache encrypted pages and transactions.
However I do admit that this *could* be requested by subpoena. Still, I think this as once again been blown out of proportion....
Ammo
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|