-
March 8th, 2002, 06:31 PM
#11
good job. therefore 0+0=Infinite
-
March 8th, 2002, 06:41 PM
#12
Originally posted by chsh
Here's a good question: What's the value of 22/7?
22/7 is used by lazy students who aren't capable of remembering 3.14159265358979.... (Pi, that is).... 22/7 is close enough, but it ain't the real thing
-
March 8th, 2002, 06:54 PM
#13
Originally posted here by Negative
22/7 is used by lazy students who aren't capable of remembering 3.14159265358979.... (Pi, that is).... 22/7 is close enough, but it ain't the real thing
LOL! Good answer!
Chris Shepherd
The Nelson-Shepherd cutoff: The point at which you realise someone is an idiot while trying to help them.
\"Well as far as the spelling, I speak fluently both your native languages. Do you even can try spell mine ?\" -- Failed Insult
Is your whole family retarded, or did they just catch it from you?
-
March 9th, 2002, 09:30 PM
#14
22/7=3.1428571428571428571428571428571
pi=3.141592653589793238462643383279, get more at http://users.pandora.be/gotte/Coolstuff/pi.htm .
Other nice math related pages:
Big Numbers: http://www.ecstaticfuturist.com/MiscInfo/numbers.html (did you know that 10^111 is called sextrigintillion?-)
The Prime Pages: http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/ (7919 is the prime number #1000)
The 27 Conspiracy: http://www.lbstone.com/27/ (I don't know what to think about this...)
Q: Why do computer scientists confuse Christmas and Halloween?
A: Because Oct 31 = Dec 25
-
March 10th, 2002, 04:37 PM
#15
Junior Member
I thought Pi was incalculable? If you want to use it and use it in all its irrational number-ness you have to go via 22/7 rather than 3.14...Because the latter is only a tiny part of Pi's value,
Are they still logging the value of Pi somewhere?
hindsight
-
March 10th, 2002, 04:37 PM
#16
Junior Member
I thought Pi was incalculable? If you want to use it and use it in all its irrational number-ness you have to go via 22/7 rather than 3.14...Because the latter is only a tiny part of Pi's value,
Are they still logging the value of Pi somewhere?
hindsight
-
March 10th, 2002, 06:05 PM
#17
From http://www.joyofpi.com/pifacts.htm
A number, represented by said letter, expressing the ratio of the circumference of a perfect circle to its diameter. The value of pi has been calculated to many millions of decimal places, to no readily apparent purpose: no perfect circles or spheres exist in nature, since matter is composed of atoms and therefore lumpy, not smooth. Nature
herself sometimes takes to rounding off the more extreme decimals of numbers when they get sufficiently small, as Prof. Heisenberg has pointed out. However, the continued extension of pi provides a harmless exercise of computer power which would otherwise be misused playing Quake or surfing pointless web sites.
22/7 is not even near pi, so using that one isn't such a good idea
You can find the current record here and here's the box they used for it...
-
March 10th, 2002, 06:05 PM
#18
From http://www.joyofpi.com/pifacts.htm
A number, represented by said letter, expressing the ratio of the circumference of a perfect circle to its diameter. The value of pi has been calculated to many millions of decimal places, to no readily apparent purpose: no perfect circles or spheres exist in nature, since matter is composed of atoms and therefore lumpy, not smooth. Nature
herself sometimes takes to rounding off the more extreme decimals of numbers when they get sufficiently small, as Prof. Heisenberg has pointed out. However, the continued extension of pi provides a harmless exercise of computer power which would otherwise be misused playing Quake or surfing pointless web sites.
22/7 is not even near pi, so using that one isn't such a good idea
You can find the current record here and here's the box they used for it...
-
March 11th, 2002, 06:27 AM
#19
Originally posted here by Flibberdy
Here's somethign to think about.
X^0=1, for all values of X
so => 0^0 = 1.. but it isn't.. any1 care to explain why, coz it has me flummoxed
Those late night drinking/thinking sessions are really not a good idea...
Flibberdy
the rule is "x^0 = 1 for every value of X excluding 0"
0^0 is like saying 0/0...its undefined.
- 8-
There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary, and those who dont.
-
March 11th, 2002, 04:56 PM
#20
Here's something I posted a while ago about division by zero...
Division by zero indeed is undefined, and it should stay that way.
Why? Because if you allow a 'Divide by Zero', you'll get things like this:
Code:
Premisse: a = b
1. a²=ab
Because a = b
2. a² + a² = a² + ab
Add a²
3. 2a² = a² + ab
x + x = 2x
4. 2a² - 2ab = a² + ab - 2ab
Add -2ab
5. 2a² - 2ab = a² - ab
xy - 2xy = -xy
6. 2(a² - ab) = 1(a² - ab)
Single out the factors
7. {2(a² - ab)} / {a² - ab} = {1(a² - ab)} / {a² - ab}
I'll get to this one in a few...
2 = 1
There you go: 2 = 1
A practical example:
Code:
Premise: a=2 and b=2
1. 2² = 2 x 2
2. 4 + 4 = 4 + 4
3. 2 x 4 = 4 + 4
4. 2 x 4 - 8 = 4 + 4 - 8
5. 2 x 4 - 2 x 4 = 4 - 4
6. 2(4 - 4) = 1(4 - 4)
Steps 1 - 6 are correct, but step 7 is why x / 0 should be undefined:
Code:
2 / (4 - 4) = 1 / (4 - 4)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|