-
December 31st, 2003, 04:10 AM
#1
Oh man, we're doomed!
Hillary’s “coronation” as President is thus set for January 20, 2005, following her acclaimed win at the polls the previous November, 2004. Her four years in the U.S. Senate will be simply Hillary’s biding her time until she is crowned as our imperial President.
http://www.conspiracyworld.com/
it must be a conspiracy, eh?
I came in to the world with nothing. I still have most of it.
-
December 31st, 2003, 07:13 AM
#2
If she doesn't die before then.
-
December 31st, 2003, 09:43 AM
#3
Hillary President? Hell yeah, maybe she'll be a communist, , no really i dont belive such theories and conspiracies untill proven.
-
December 31st, 2003, 10:18 AM
#4
I see she even shaved some body parts in an effort to do away with bush.
-
December 31st, 2003, 04:20 PM
#5
-
January 4th, 2004, 06:01 AM
#6
ROFL.
I don't usually advocate violence, but Hillary either needs a good beating, or a few good bong hits. Hillary for President scares me more than 1984.
hmmm...
/Me compromises and beats her with my bong.
Real security doesn't come with an installer.
-
January 4th, 2004, 08:51 AM
#7
That would be really scary for the people of the United States. Yes I would have to say that it is a conspiracy. Hey instead of Monica it'll be Hillaries turn this time around ....
-
January 9th, 2004, 05:06 PM
#8
Hillary is not yet done with America. Is America done with her?
Trappedagainbyperfectlogic.
-
January 9th, 2004, 05:09 PM
#9
Originally posted here by D0pp139an93r
ROFL.
I don't usually advocate violence, but Hillary either needs a good beating, or a few good bong hits. Hillary for President scares me more than 1984.
hmmm...
/Me compromises and beats her with my bong.
Maybe a woman president would not want to fight so much... Might be good for us since we have that "bulldog" lets fight with anyone who even remotely pisses us off...
N00b> STFU i r teh 1337 (english: You must be mistaken, good sir or madam. I believe myself to be quite a good player. On an unrelated matter, I also apparently enjoy math.)
-
January 10th, 2004, 01:44 AM
#10
I don't know - look at Margaret Thatcher and Indira Ghandi, both presided over or in, conflicts. Of course there is also the country itself and its psych makeup that influences a leader, whatever the gender.
Trappedagainbyperfectlogic.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|