-
February 7th, 2004, 07:45 PM
#1
Senior Member
Shall i use 2.6 kernel?
Ok i am relatively new on linux and i use a 2.4.20 kernel ...is it a good idea to download the 2.6 kernel (is it better than the 2.4.x series) or should i wait until it becomes stable?
Ps:sb told me that each new kernel has some specific new characteristics about some specific apps..is that true? I mean is there a difference between two kernels concerning 'quality' (security,etc)??
-
February 8th, 2004, 11:36 AM
#2
2.6.2 is now in the stable branch 
Whether you upgrade or not is entirely up to you. I suggest a bit of reading to see what benefits your system will get by the upgrade.
2.4.20 has been upgraded somewhat to 2.4.24. Some security issues have been addressed in the later kernels in the 2.4 branch so an upgrade would not be a bad idea - even staying in the 2.4 series.
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/799 .... should give you a heads up on whats invovled in upgrading to the 2.6 kernels - but I would check out the forums that are specific to your distro to get an idea what others have done and the problems they have faced and overcome.
My Slackware box runs a lot smoother and faster on the 2.6 kernel, but I have kept the 2.4.24 on there as a backup just in case I play too much. 
With all that said, everything is working fine here on 2.6.2.
-
February 8th, 2004, 01:57 PM
#3
w000tz0r!! 2.6.2 works beautifully. I had some problems with 2.4.22 earlier, but with 2.6.2 everything "Just Works".
Cheers,
cgkanchi
-
February 8th, 2004, 03:40 PM
#4
I'm going to agree here with upgrading your kernel to AT LEAST 2.4.24. I have yet to upgrade to 2.6.X, but mainly because of my decent uptime, and the "It's not broken, it's not slow, it's fast, it's stable, leave it the **** alone untill prepaired to lose uptime" way of thinking on this box.
2.6, if you see a use you need it for, should be fine, but if you like 2.4.X, then stick with that, but get 2.4.24 at least.
-
February 8th, 2004, 11:08 PM
#5
Senior Member
Thanks guys... i am just downloading the 2.4.24 (i will patch right now) and 2.6.2 for later use...
to gore: could you explain me why you said 'if you see a use you need it for'? I mean does the 2.6 has some specific reasons of existence (for some particular apps) or not? Sorry if i am becoming a bit of a lamer i will have to google maybe to see what each kernel is for...
Cheers
Is that the place where I am supposed to say sth clever and brilliant so that everybody understands how clever nice guy I am????
Screw you guys I am going home!-Kartman
-
February 9th, 2004, 02:10 AM
#6
Well, if there is a driver for example you want/need, then that would be an example. Or if you want to use it for other reasons. I just mean there is no reason to jump on an upgrade, but also, it can be nice. The choice is up to you.
-
February 10th, 2004, 09:07 PM
#7
Senior Member
Ok gore thanks for info...i guess it is a bit harder than i thought to compile successfully the kernel so now i am on it
Is that the place where I am supposed to say sth clever and brilliant so that everybody understands how clever nice guy I am????
Screw you guys I am going home!-Kartman
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|