View Poll Results: MemorY is a...

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll
  • dude

    13 48.15%
  • chick

    2 7.41%
  • other

    1 3.70%
  • all of the above

    11 40.74%
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Should we get rid of "Mr. Miyagi" ?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,210

    Should we get rid of "Mr. Miyagi" ?

    We still see from time to time people confused about this warning page when their negative points puts them down in that range.. Personally, I think that the message should be changed to accurately describe to that user what it's all about without any humiliation.. let's face it, jp's sense of humor was sometimes a bit strange.. (I'm thinking of the suicidal gif of a person hanging by rope as well)


    edit : I might be mixing things up here. Was Mr. Miyagi the out of balance message ?
    (I haven't seen them in a long time)

    but my point is.. maybe both messages need some editing..

  2. #2
    We can fix the problem of users whining about the 'confusing' message easily -- ban them as soon as they reach 0 antipoints. Then flash them a nice little popup explaining how to create a new account and troll more effectivley - hey, they are gonna go do it anyway.

    "Back in my day", and im sure this is the case with many of the users on this board, *I* found myself able to easily get over the 'pain in the ass' message, and i didnt get suicidal tendancies from looking at the hanging-man. Honestly, i think you should give the bulk of new users a little more credit -- they aren't *all* whinging prepubsecents who can't tell "LOL" from "KEKEKEKE ^___^".

    Regards,

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    686
    I have mixed feelings about banning users without a warning though. You have to remember that some people use the AP system to put others down just because, and sometimes people will gang up on one individual and really lower their status. So I think consideration of when someone is banned should still be in mind.

    Though I agree that when this was JP's site, things worked a little differently. Now that it's controlled by a company rather than one individual, maybe it is time to update all the warning pages and such. It just seems like the thing to do since people can't run back to JP and ask questions like it was back then.

    But if the warning page, or really any page, gets updated... maybe it should be a vote by the community? Or at least let everyone throw in their word so that it can be something that everyne agrees on. People can make things more diverse than one person, right?

    Just a thought...
    ~AciD
    [shadow]There is no right and wrong, only fun and boring...
    Formatting my server because someone hacked into it sounds pretty boring to me...
    That\'s why it\'s all about AntiOnline.com!
    [/shadow]

  4. #4
    AO Guinness Monster MURACU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    paris
    Posts
    1,003
    I think it needs to be reworked a small bit. I gave out my first positive antipoint with a value today and I get the message saying I am being too generous.
    Ok it is true 1 positive antipoints weights much more than 0 negative antipoints.
    \"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.\"
    \"The reason we are so pleased to find other people\'s secrets is that it distracts public attention from our own.\"
    Oscar Wilde(1854-1900)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    462
    I was looking through the various AP messages today and I kindof like the Mr. Miyagi message...we could make the message more straightforward, but I get the impression that most folks here would prefer to keep those messages a bit less formal. If that's not the case, we can certainly edit it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •