-
March 24th, 2004, 12:10 AM
#11
-
March 24th, 2004, 11:45 AM
#12
Junior Member
Looks like I started quite a decent thread, for a change
Thanks guys , to be honest I think my best bet would be to re-biuld my MS box with FAT32, never did like NTFS anyway but then who does.... It was meant to be tighter security wise is it I never noticed Muhahaha
-:s33ka:-
Be pure, Be Clean,
Behave....
-
March 24th, 2004, 04:20 PM
#13
Originally posted here by s33ka
Looks like I started quite a decent thread, for a change
Thanks guys , to be honest I think my best bet would be to re-biuld my MS box with FAT32, never did like NTFS anyway but then who does.... It was meant to be tighter security wise is it I never noticed Muhahaha
I wouldn't scoff at the security benefits to NTFS. Without NTFS there are no such thing as ownership rights and limitations on file access (whala Win95), along with all of the other security benefits such things provide, assuming the person doing the admin work uses them properly. I have also found NTFS to be a more stable and reliable FS than FAT32; however, you do of course have the problem of a limited number of OSs that read/write it properly. If you are strictly going to use it in a Win2k/XP/2k3 environment, I wouldn't use anything but NTFS....
There is only one constant, one universal, it is the only real truth: causality. Action. Reaction. Cause and effect...There is no escape from it, we are forever slaves to it. Our only hope, our only peace is to understand it, to understand the 'why'. 'Why' is what separates us from them, you from me. 'Why' is the only real social power, without it you are powerless.
(Merovingian - Matrix Reloaded)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|