They're at it again

Ron O'Brien, senior security analyst at Sophos, explained to internetnews.com that the Mac statement was made in the context of whether the end user is committed to the effort or time to manage and maintain a safe and protected Windows environment. If not, he said, then perhaps Mac would be a more viable alternative
So, I have a $3,500 PC with Windows and I should now ditch that for $4,000 worth of Apple, that I have even less idea how to use? And this will make me "more secure"?

As we all know, second hand PC kit is pretty worthless, so that would be an almost total write-off.

Rather than spend $4,000 and waste $3,500 wouldn't it make more sense to employ a professional to create a secure Windows environment?......................it would be one hell of a lot cheaper, and most stuff will auto-update.

All you would need then is a maintenance contract?

For an existing PC home owner this has to make sense. The trouble is that most home owners don't even realise that there is a problem...............so they won't be buying an Apple anyway