-
October 17th, 2006, 10:29 PM
#61
This design is so ****ing lame.
...This Space For Rent.
-[WebCarnage]
-
October 17th, 2006, 10:36 PM
#62
This design is so ****ing lame.
I have to agree this design IS FOR ****!!! Again, bring back the OLD AO.
This site is a phucking disgrace! LEAVE THE WEB SITE ALONE!!! Your ****ING IT UP LEAVE IT ALONE. Your bestest friend Michael from fort myers florida
Last edited by Computernerd22; October 17th, 2006 at 10:39 PM.
-
October 17th, 2006, 10:38 PM
#63
this is weak sauce... i can't believe they did this. it looks sooooo shitty
-
October 17th, 2006, 10:52 PM
#64
OK.............if a few weeks down the line you feel the same then say it again?...... hey, this was a MAJOR UPDATE was it not? I would not expect it to go smoothly, and, after the first attempt, you reign in your ambitions a bit
This is still "work in progress", but, hell's teeth, at least we have made some progress?
Sure..........it isn't like it was........ well, I can remember going from DOS to Windows 3.x...on to Win 95.....on to Win 98, then SE then ME. Not to mention NT 4.0 and 2000 at the same time............. then XP.
If you cannot handle change, you shouldn't be in IT.
This is the "first cut" and we still have a way to go...... but at least we are going forwards?
My views
-
October 17th, 2006, 11:09 PM
#65
Sorry nihil, but I disagree...this is not in my opinion an upgrade...a major change yes...but an upgrade no...no offense is intended to those who worked on this...but, to quote er0k:
i can't believe they did this. it looks sooooo shitty
hopefully, it'll get better...but I'm not going to hold my breath.
It looks like it was hurried...it should have, as others have stated, been done off-line and the old AO left up until it was ready.
It doesn't look ready. ..like you said...it looks like a ' work in progress ' still.
Eg
-
October 17th, 2006, 11:22 PM
#66
It seems like those who complained the most about the old design have found something new to complain about...
-
October 17th, 2006, 11:31 PM
#67
-
October 17th, 2006, 11:36 PM
#68
-
October 17th, 2006, 11:47 PM
#69
Eg > If you never complained about the old design, then I didn't address you in my post.
The main point was to upgrade the forum, even though you're claiming in all your wisdom that this wasn't one... The upgrade was a success (which doesn't mean that there aren't issues left), and whether or not you like the design is personal opinion.
About "the old AO should have been left up until this one was ready": you're a forum admin yourself, you should know that that is impossible as there comes a point where you need to make the transition. The new version has been up for a month or so (so it's not like mnstrgrl just downloaded some upgrades and decided to see what would happen...), and was pretty thoroughly tested - again, it's the transition that's the tricky part...
-
October 17th, 2006, 11:48 PM
#70
I thought I would weigh in now... I for one dont like this new format but im not gonna go on and on bitching because I personally have no way of changing anything, just wanted to say I dont like it no offense to others who worked on it.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|