-
March 13th, 2008, 02:33 AM
#1
Cyber Command ?
http://www.afcyber.af.mil/
Their site hardly looks like anything "government". And I wonder why they aren't keeping such a low profile as their Chinese and Russian counterparts. So, Anyone here a member ?
Last edited by PacketThirst; March 13th, 2008 at 02:43 AM.
-
March 13th, 2008, 03:06 AM
#2
I have seen one or two news articles about them setting that up.
I think that what we are looking at is some sort of recruitment exercise front for it.
I think that at present the staff are mostly on secondment from elsewhere whilst they get it going?
Send them your CV
-
March 13th, 2008, 04:39 AM
#3
Im not from the U.S ... i guess that matters :-(
-
March 21st, 2008, 10:16 PM
#4
Member
Gen. Lord recently answered some questions from the slashdot community (even dodged one of mine :P)
http://interviews.slashdot.org/artic.../03/12/1427252
I'm tachyon13 there. I'm not so much disappointed that my question wasn't really answered (got to expect that from a PR perspective) but it's that he seemed to claim ignorance that 'security isn't a priority' is not common practice in the government (That is, till a breach happens).
Oh well. Good reading though, and at the very least, he took the time to field questions.
Tachyon
|-----|Alcohol is my anti-drug |-----|
-
March 21st, 2008, 11:27 PM
#5
I recognized the name (Cyber Command) from the commercials they started running not too long ago. I tried to search for the online version, and came up with this: http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...rce-cyber.html
It's cyber war! Lawyers representing the Air Force's elite electronic warriors have sent YouTube a DMCA takedown notice demanding the removal of the 30-second spot the Air Force created to promote its nascent Cyber Command.
And then the icing on the cake:
U.S. Government works aren't even copyrightable. YouTube doesn't know that -- presumably because it has no lawyers -- and it's taken down the video. A spokeswoman said in an e-mail that the Google-owned service has no choice but to comply with DMCA notices. That's not quite right, though. YouTube has no legal obligation to remove non-infringing content.
Does it get any better than that?
Similar Threads
-
By E5C4P3 in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 33
Last Post: January 17th, 2008, 12:40 AM
-
By souleman in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 7
Last Post: June 2nd, 2003, 08:29 AM
-
By -DaRK-RaiDeR- in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 13
Last Post: January 10th, 2003, 07:10 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|