-
January 12th, 2010, 09:43 AM
#11
waaaay to many features that i'm not interested in, i like it minimalistic. 
anyhow i downloaded it, installed it, and have been using it for the last few days now.
I got tired of searching around for adblocking for it so i had to dust of my old copy of proxomitron and use that to filter my interwebz.
So far it's not doing to good on the check list i made prior to installing..
4 more days and it will be decision time on wether or not i keep using it or i uninstall it and continue calling it the sissy girl browser.
-
January 12th, 2010, 09:06 PM
#12
Sissy? I used to view AntiOnline in Links, Firefox is sissy!
-
January 13th, 2010, 03:09 AM
#13
firefox has more marketshare then Opera. so that would make Opera, FF's bitch then?
-
January 13th, 2010, 06:14 AM
#14
Come to Detroit and tell a Minority they're someone's bitch
-
January 13th, 2010, 06:37 AM
#15
 Originally Posted by gore
Come to Detroit and tell a Minority they're someone's bitch 
wtf?
-
January 13th, 2010, 06:50 AM
#16
Errr, I made a joke about how you said since Opera is a minority that it was a bitch for Firefox. I took the word minority from the market share (Opera is the minority compared to IE and Firefox for example, which are the majority). See?
-
January 14th, 2010, 07:23 PM
#17
Just wondering if the following statement is accurate, anyone:
Internet Explorer - Loads of updates, largely compatible and security is OK
Firefox - Regular updates, compatible but with some exceptions, security is better than IE
Opera - Less frequent updates, less compatible than both IE and FF and security is between FF and IE ...
I find that web browsers are like the decor of a house or the colour of an outfit.... they all function just fine, but it usually boils down to personal taste and experience.
CTO
no signature was attached to this email
-
January 21st, 2010, 03:09 PM
#18
I find it doubtful. The most secure program is always the one the fewest people use, and in this case that would be opera.
And yes, I agree, for the most part it's all about personal preference. There are very few hard differences between them.
-
January 21st, 2010, 07:08 PM
#19
Hmmm firefox, sounds like that same marketing gimmick where the software promised to increase the amount of hardware RAM in the machine.. Hmmmm
Parth Maniar,
CISSP, CISM, CISA, SSCP
*Thank you GOD*
Greater the Difficulty, SWEETER the Victory.
Believe in yourself.
-
January 22nd, 2010, 07:49 AM
#20
Now this is a proof of disgusting programing standards! While one thread about new version isn't over, there is a new firefox upgrade available!
Honestly, I really wonder how many members here even consider "firefox" a decent browser!
I would rather surf with IE6 (unpatched)
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/...to+Firefox+3.6
Parth Maniar,
CISSP, CISM, CISA, SSCP
*Thank you GOD*
Greater the Difficulty, SWEETER the Victory.
Believe in yourself.
Similar Threads
-
By Cider in forum Operating Systems
Replies: 10
Last Post: March 21st, 2006, 09:30 PM
-
By tyger_claw in forum General Computer Discussions
Replies: 1
Last Post: February 3rd, 2006, 12:23 AM
-
By SDK in forum The Security Tutorials Forum
Replies: 2
Last Post: December 8th, 2005, 12:02 PM
-
By SDK in forum Spyware / Adware
Replies: 12
Last Post: February 9th, 2005, 08:11 PM
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 2
Last Post: October 13th, 2004, 04:31 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|