Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Win2k

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    12

    Post win2k

    its still not better than win3.1 i still use it on a ibm i have freakin old but its more realiable

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    412
    Well thats just not true, i used 3.1 for years and have been using w2k for a couple of years now as well, w2k is far more reliable.

  3. #13
    I'm thinking about installing win2k on my computer but I don't know if i should go with xp. I am running win98 right now. Can anyone give me some pointers or advice? (and, no....i won't go back to 3.1 hell. oh how i hate you 3.1)

  4. #14
    Why do so many people here seem to like Win 3.1???
    If you wanna talk about compatibility problems, then there's your winner right there!

    And NetBEUI was a sad excuse for a protocol!

    -8trak

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •