Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Microsoft's new "security" idea

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    638
    I'm all in favour of educating users instead of implementing new fangled password authentication schemes. If users don't take security seriously, it doesn't matter how good your authentication system is. They still leave the system vulnerable to exploitation.
    OpenBSD - The proactively secure operating system.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    502
    I'm all in favour of educating users instead of implementing new fangled password authentication schemes.
    I agree.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    376
    Ok, so let me see if I get this straight....

    Your password is a sequence of pictures that the user chooses? These pictures are stored on the hard drive of the user, and all are of the same format...? If this is the way that the system would work, I think I see a small problem: anyone who was able to break onto the usres hard drive would be able to search for all the image files that fite the pparamaters of the password scheme, and then uses those in a cracking program to break this password. I think that this would severly reduce the nuber of possible passwords, and make it very easy for an individual dto break the passowrd. Almost like having a dictionary on the hard drive from which the pass "phrase" must come from...

    I could be completely off on this....
    - Jimmy Mac

    Replicants are like any technology, if there not a hazard, its not my problem....

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    1,193
    but you are probably not.
    Trappedagainbyperfectlogic.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •