Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Why hax0rs don't care about 802.11

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    872
    Thought this may intrest you. It talks about how to get into and/or stop others from hacking your 802.11x...

    http://www.securiteam.com/securityre...FP010A80E.html
    ...This Space For Rent.

    -[WebCarnage]

  2. #12

  3. #13

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    131
    Did you know that wireless lans/wans can be easily "hacked" with linksys boxes? These boxes allow you to set your MAC address, which means all you realy would have to do is scan an wireless network for MAC's and set one to your own. Or since everyone is talking about social engineering is such a big topic, im sure you could just get someones mac addy from them.

    Either way. Nothing is, or ever will be hack proof. and the world just needs to realize this and learn how to deal with it.
    Whats a \"START\" button?

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    131
    Did you know that wireless lans/wans can be easily "hacked" with linksys boxes? These boxes allow you to set your MAC address, which means all you realy would have to do is scan an wireless network for MAC's and set one to your own. Or since everyone is talking about social engineering is such a big topic, im sure you could just get someones mac addy from them.

    Either way. Nothing is, or ever will be hack proof. and the world just needs to realize this and learn how to deal with it.
    Whats a \"START\" button?

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    321
    lol, in cisco AP you used to be able to take over an AP by having a more powerful emitter ....
    i don't know tough if they fixed it yet or no....
    assembly.... digital dna ?

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    321
    lol, in cisco AP you used to be able to take over an AP by having a more powerful emitter ....
    i don't know tough if they fixed it yet or no....
    assembly.... digital dna ?

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    18
    Wireless network are useful for the bad guy only to dissimulate the source of the attack... Or steal some bandwidth... Is more like a tool, not an exploit...

    The basic way to protect a wireless network (WEP, MAC filtering, etc) is only good enough to get rid of the pass-by hackers. Lot of business get a wireless network because is cheap... But forget to protect it or don't want to pay for it... because is very expensive to do so...

  9. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    18
    Wireless network are useful for the bad guy only to dissimulate the source of the attack... Or steal some bandwidth... Is more like a tool, not an exploit...

    The basic way to protect a wireless network (WEP, MAC filtering, etc) is only good enough to get rid of the pass-by hackers. Lot of business get a wireless network because is cheap... But forget to protect it or don't want to pay for it... because is very expensive to do so...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •