Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: What exactly does "Binary Compatible" mean?

  1. October 8th, 2006, 06:59 AM #1
    Arkimedes
    Arkimedes is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    106

    What exactly does "Binary Compatible" mean?

    I was looking at the descriptions of several Operating Systems (and toy Operating Systems) and things like UnixLite is said to be "binary compatible" with Linux, and CentOS is "binary compatible" with Red Hat applications, etc.

    But what the deuce does "binary compatible" mean? I can't figure it out for the life of me!

    Thanks for the help!
    "The Texan turned out to be good-natured, generous and likeable. In three days no one could stand him." Catch 22 by Joseph Heller.

    Buddies? I have no buddies...


    Give the BSD daemon some love (proud FreeBSD user)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. October 8th, 2006, 09:57 AM #2
    nihil
    nihil is offline
    Senior Member nihil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    United Kingdom: Bridlington
    Posts
    17,188
    Hi,

    I am probably wrong, but this would be my view:

    We use different "high level languages"...........COBOL, ALGOL, FORTRAN, C, C+ and so on?........ they would generally be in hexadecimal?

    At the bottom line, all boxes speak binary? like 0 and 1.............

    So, I would imagine that when it gets to machine code the languages are compatible?

    This might seem like a trivial or trite response, but please remember that with assembly language, the processor matters as well?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. October 8th, 2006, 11:49 AM #3
    the_JinX
    the_JinX is offline
    Leftie Linux Lover the_JinX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Beverwijk Netherlands
    Posts
    2,534
    It usualy means that binary packages of one system should work on the other..
    In the case of the centos / redhat it should mean that redhat .rpm packages should install and work on a centos install..

    In the case of unixlite I think it means big fat 'static' linux binaries should install and run on it..

    Does that still make sense ?
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI.
    When in Russia, pet a PETSCII.
    Get your ass over to SLAYRadio the best station for C64 Remixes !
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. October 9th, 2006, 04:12 PM #4
    thehorse13
    thehorse13 is offline
    Master-Jedi-Pimps0r & Moderator thehorse13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Washington D.C. area
    Posts
    2,886
    Jinxy's explanation is right on the money. I've used RedHat RPM packages on CentOS with success in the past.

    --Th13
    Our scars have the power to remind us that our past was real. -- Hannibal Lecter.
    Talent is God given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful. -- John Wooden
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules