You write a first post on outdated material. Ok, that's alright, even though I negged you for it because it wasn't original, it wasn't new, and it wasn't anything 'interesting' like people said.

You also include in your signature to look at your profile and whatnot, which includes a picture of some random girl in a school-girl outfit. That's fine too but I'm putting 2+2 together already.

Someone states a point on the age of the article you linked to and negs you for it and you neg them back. Nothing wrong with that but you came off as a 'newbie' in your roll-call post (which may have been deleted by now). Newbies don't know about antipoints fully, they don't know neat-o tricks like 'post a flame thread saying how mean everyone is' in Roll Call where no replies are able to be posted, and they definitely don't know/care about the 'most viewed profiles' count (of which, once again, to get more views, has a pic of some random girl in a school-girl outfit).

Moral of this story (even though I think I'm going out on a limb here): who are you, and why are you even here if you're NOT a newbie and you're just trying to get everyone's positive approval. Fake people disgust me and God alone knows I'm not going to stand around idly and let it go on if something can be done about it to any degree.

EDIT: btw, this could have been avoided if you just pm'd or emailed me or the person who negged you instead of leaving in a huff (which I doubt). Your credibility could've been somewhat salvaged.