Originally posted here by Mahakaal
Hrrmmm....the only one who seems "a little pissed about the US/UK et al's attitude" in this thread is me. Let me guess subtle flames are not really your forte. <----example of subtle flame.

And now to your "rant"... bet you didnt know that until the Gulf War that Iraq had one of best healthcare industries in the Middle East, comparable to most Western countries. That is of course until we bombed the crap out of them.

Now you tell me who was it that gave him all these lovely weapons? He sure as **** didnt develop them indigenously. I bet you didn't know that either, but that's okay I didn't expect you to. <----example of a not so subtle flame.

Whoa, hold up their dude. First, Iraq has laid claim that they have gotten them from other Arabic countries. No article can prove the own dictator wrong. Secondly, it say's in the article that we were selling them up 'till 1992? That's odd that nearly two years after they invade kuwait, that we give them weapons of mass destruction.

I'm sure you can be right to a degree, but I have quite a few arguable points to the fact that the U.S (based on facts and news) didn't sell Iraq jack.