It's not a war on Iraq, it's a war on it's current leader. The reason for this is that he is considered an immediate threat to boardering countries of Iraq, and also yes the usa as well ( though not as easily). Will you all support a war if he kills a few more thousand people? How bout a million? How many people need to die by SH's hands before other counties relize he IS a BAD person? That is the reason we want HIM disarm'd, it's not about Iraq and it's people....
He is definately a bad man. You will get no argument from me on this point. I would like to see him disarmed as well but I would like to see this done internationally not by the US and UK alone.

IMO our world has quite a few bad men in positions of authority and always has. All I am trying to say is that I have reservations about running all around the world spending outrageous amounts of (our) money killing these bad men without concrete reasons.

If we do this in Iraq without the UN does it end there? Do we then continue the campaign to exterminate the rest of the "AXIS of Evil" on our own? What happens to Iraq when we leave? If and when I see some evidence to back up what Bush and Blair are saying this may change my opinion but for now I am concerned.