Some of you might remember the first 'Cosmos Games'... this one is gonna be a little different...

In contrast to the 'you vs. me'-objective of the first Cosmos Games, this one is about compromises. The goal is multiple: I'd like to find out if we Antionliners are really able to set apart our 'you vs. me'-feelings. I'd like to find out if different nationalities/cultures are able to reach a compromise all parties agree with.

To make a long story short: we all seem to disagree on what's going on in Iraq.
Let's find out if we can at least agree on something...

So, basically, the goal of this challenge is to get to one compromise, to see if we can take the same stand on something... an 'unofficial' AntiOnline stand if you want...

What inspired me for this is the Belgian situation: we have liberalists, socialists and environmentalists in our government (catholics and nationalist are in the opposition... and they all formed frontier against racists). Although being in totally different 'camps', they always seem to come to one conclusion supported by all...

Anyways, here's the subject:

- Napster, Morpheus, Kazaa: blame the messenger? or blame the message?
- mp3: idem
- The music-industry: making too much money already? Or going broke because of P2P?
- The artists themselves: over-paid? Victims of p2p?
- Governments and music industry: allowed to 'spy' on p2p-users?
- P2P-networks: should they be forbidden?
- Your ISP handing over your IP to the authorities?
- A tax on blank CD's to cover it all?
- ...

Let the games begin... in about 6 weeks (the average in Belgian politics) we should come to a compromise.

Everybody is free to join.