I had read this threw a link on packetstorm today but didnt have time to post anything on it so im glad this thread is here.

I think Salgado is trying to tap into the frustration of a privacy minded but much stomped upon community for publicity. Hoping he'll find support for anything thats anti DMCA because thats what this law is about Copy right protection and catching those "defrauding" service providers, and thereby promote himself.

Now "defrauding" service providers there's a term to watch out for. This makes NAT a felony, but for him to say his very education and degree make HIM illegal is just a bit much.

Running a honey pot is not "Intercepting communication" because thats the address the hacker intended to communicate with. Building a room on a house not connected to the interior rooms but only to the outside and then leaving the door with a very easy lock to circumvent to see who's been breaking in is not entrapment (hey thats not a bad idea...RT Honeypots) even though its the only purpose for it