Just had to do a bit of time travel today. Had a client that brought the system by. Funny thing when I went to M$ so called professional download site and had beenm a major had enough so I'm gonna say. Not everyone dah M$ has your latest release and they also lack one major thing on their daily patch site and it a consistant posting of a date sometimes there other times well NOT. Now I myself and I'm old refuse to charge time for downloading their patches I never set myself up for another visit. So in buring a CD of a legecy first addition of Win 98 I found no less then 2/3 of the patches including a updated EULA no doubt to cover M$ ass. So since I am honest do my clients acceot the new EULA's or forgo them and sue M$ for what the did not cover in the original EULA? I'm no attorney by I'd say EULA's as thewy are now such what toi patch a system you first have to agree that M$ is not at fault and then trust them the patch really is that an Example the lates IE patch was a but so a new EULA to fix it wil say it's our fault as IT professionals and not them? Say I remember old snake oil stuff and carnival scams. Maybe as an IT professional I should just say this is what ya got don;t put a patch and have your attorney ask M$ about the EULA to correct their errors? Points to ponder but I'm a man of ethics who listens to such things nnow days? Why I'm still working crap..dot com happened for a reason me am to tired to but point out things leave the battle to all you young people...then again...why bother with ethics...me I'llk keep mine is a good comfort zone
Peace