|
-
September 23rd, 2003, 01:23 AM
#21
Originally posted here by gilgalad
...
fundamental numeric identity theorum:
If x = y and y = z, then
x = z
...
Originally posted here by Remote_Access
...If a Red M&M = Blue M&M and
Blue M&M = Green M&M
Then a Red = Green M&M
M&M's have an essence and there's millions of those. They're all the same. That's like saying there is only one red M&M and it can't coexist with another one because it has an "essence".
You are saying to fundamentally different things.
If x=y and y=z, then x=z, is very different than a RED M&M being a GREEN M&M.
2+2=4 and 3+1=4, so 2+2=3+1, but RED is not GREEN. Red is a M&M, and Green is a M&M, but red is not green. That is like saying a dog is an animal and a cat is an animal, therefore a dog is a cat.
R_A, you have shown one ot the primary fallacies of logic..., one that I should remember the name of, but then I graduated and as you said, Philosophy taught me to think, not regurgitate. It is also making it very difficult to find a job...(funny that in the current economy no one want a guy with a BA is Philo... ). But as you made that mistake here in the tender loving environment of the Cosmos Forum, you won't make it in class, and perhaps you can: 1 catch someone else on it, or 2 find out the name of it and re-educate me so that I can forget it again.
Negative already beat me to the punch on my comment (as he ususally does), so I had to wait for someone to say something that could draw me back into the conversation.
Good conversation.
Peace,
Dhej
The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of dusk. -Hegel
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|