The article http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/11/HNmsassault_1.html

I find this particular flavor of F.U.D. to be interesting. The argument that the Redmond Gang is going to try to
make is that Linux is less secure than Windows based on the frequency it (a certain Distro I assume and not
the kernel itself, a.k.a Linux proper) releases security patches. I understand the motivation for this, it would
not be easy to have your name all over the CERT Advisories for re-iterrations of the same issue (Windows RPC).

I am interested to see what the public non_techie and general media perception of Micosoft's findings will be.


-- spurious