Tony you are very angry at Bush for what you see as lying, but you are also angry at the 90s because what Bush accomplished today was pushed aside and that made you furious. You are aslo so angry at Bush that you atribute him to killing thousands of civilians, but the alternative is the very thing that made you so angry in the 90s. I am confused. You don't think the end justifies the means while at the same time hating the fact that the war you personally fought didn't have and outcome... and now through indirect means it does in fact have an outcome.

Bush can't even get world support, or the support of his own people to dispose of a dictator that didn't even obey international pressure that was placed on him. He's been ripe for the picken for decades, and you think it's hypocracy that he will never be able to go after another coutry on the top 7 list because he has had to fight off left mined wolves this entire war. It's not hypocracy, if given national support I may agree with you. But until that point arises, only so much can be accomplished at a time. I could see it now, Bush could make a speech saying we are going into Korea and OMG the left would be flying all over the net calling him a mass murderer, a dictator, a Nazi, a lying idiot good old boy. Please... there would probably be a post here with a tag line "Bushy does it again, the world enters another dark age"