Don't worry. It would take a lot more than this to get me to hate someone. I know what the original point was, and I said from the beginning that I agree with you 100%. I have only been trying to get you to see my point that if somebody is of the notion that XP cannot be properly configured and secured, they are going to come up with countless ways to blow holes in your test. So while I'm sure the test was fun to put together, and you may have seen some interesting things, the linux blowhards that just love to hate Windows are going to continue to hate windows regardless of what you did. So I don't really think that the windows can't be secured argument is going to die anytime soon. People just love to hate the big guy, not sure why, but they do.

And yes I know this thread may be a week or two old, but I don't have the luxury of visiting this site everyday like many of you do. When I replied yesterday was the first time I had read your response to my post from a week ago.