So what? India has had more wars than North Korea... And the Unites States which is to promote freedom and democracy has supported coups and installations of dictators such as the one in Chilé.


Who cares about food? The US is depriving the NK of it's abillity to produce fuel and power without nuclear technology. Since it has an oil embargo against the country. NK's army, cars, air-fleet, navy, powerplants, everything is running on low while the US is using it's fuel to kill people in Iraq. What sort of useless country are you if you are dependent on aid? Let North Korea develope itself...Perhaps the people will have it better then aswell.


So just cause North Korea is communist (which it by no means is - not even according to themselves) makes it okey to put sanctions on an already poor nation, deprive them of their right to develope peacefull (what they wanted at first) nuclear power and now nuclear weapons.

You still haven't answered my question:

How is the United States an more responsible nation to carry around nukes compared to North Korea?







Oh and I am not even sure if I should reply on this but: Where in the name of god have you heard of one single peasant starving in the Soviet Union? This compared to the age of the Tsar when many were starving - even the army. So don't come here and talk rubish about the USSR. Russia was one of the least developed countries at the start of World War 1. At the end of world war 2 (even though it suffered the greatest manpower and economic losses in both wars) it was one of the most developed.

Stalin did some bad **** but if you are going to start lying that those people who'm he didn't massmurder (which is like 98% of the population) that they were starving or having it any less good than those in the west then you should at least put some facts out to support your statement.