|
-
July 23rd, 2007, 02:12 PM
#8
Hi
Substitution ciphers _can_ be extremely secure. Actually, the only known
class of unbreakable ciphers is often categorised as a subsitution ciphers:
the one-time pad (or see also polyalphabetic substitutions).
The drawback certainly is that the key has to be quite long, has to be perfectly
random, and the pad should not be got lost 
Modern ciphers, like AES, are block ciphers, which combine base elements,
such as substitution and transposition.
Substitution (S-box) is a mean to increase confusion, which is besides
diffusion, one of the main criteria to characterise cryptographic systems
(see Shannon[1]) in order to frustrate statistical analysis.
Oofki, I do have a question: how do you decrypt a ciphertext, which was encrypted with an irreversible algorithm? 
Cheers
[1] http://netlab.cs.ucla.edu/wiki/files/shannon1949.pdf
Last edited by sec_ware; July 23rd, 2007 at 02:22 PM.
If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.
(Abraham Maslow, Psychologist, 1908-70)
Similar Threads
-
By Euclid in forum Tech Humor
Replies: 0
Last Post: September 2nd, 2002, 07:04 PM
-
By smirc in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 6
Last Post: May 13th, 2002, 04:35 PM
-
By smirc in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 3
Last Post: May 13th, 2002, 03:24 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|