|
-
August 4th, 2007, 12:32 PM
#11
Hi, brokencrow,
...the reason it was done was because it's billable. THE NUMBERS... the numbers are God in today's world.
Sure, but when I was doing that sort of thing, I never had any difficulty in selling the additional time for a test on a "reference machine" and for a contingency plan. If the task was more complex we would do a "proof of concept" exercise.
Was this "senior security analyst" one of your guys or an outsider?
I must say that this is a very weird situation. I can live with SAV perhaps clashing with some applications, particularly on start up, but corrupting video drivers and the looping reboots does sound bizarre.
It is a security product after all, it shouldn't have anything to do with video drivers, which I would have expected to have loaded before the AV? You may well have done this, but I would look at a sample of boxes that work and a sample of those with problems and see if there are any differences in the startup sequences.
The rebooting might be SAV itself? try doing a manual update on one of those, without it connected to the network? see if that solves it. I am guessing that an update of this magnitude requires a reboot, and perhaps it has "gotten all confused"
Similar Threads
-
By debwalin in forum Tech Humor
Replies: 0
Last Post: September 1st, 2005, 08:49 PM
-
By Tiger Shark in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 5
Last Post: January 14th, 2005, 08:47 PM
-
By DjM in forum AntiVirus Discussions
Replies: 4
Last Post: May 30th, 2003, 12:13 AM
-
By khakisrule in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 15
Last Post: July 26th, 2002, 12:43 AM
-
By GreekGoddess in forum Cosmos
Replies: 11
Last Post: June 23rd, 2002, 04:24 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|