|
-
June 2nd, 2008, 07:38 PM
#1
FUD You! Vista vs. 2000 Security
About.com's Tony Bradley takes PC Tools to task for their dubious claims...
Vendor Claims Vista Less Secure Than Windows 2000 - About.com
Based on the PC Tools Software results, one would expect to find 64% of all Vista PC's infected with some type of malware, however the data from Microsoft's Malicious Software Removal Tool for the second half of 2007 show that the number is actually less than 3% (compared with 5% for Windows 2000 SP4).
Though many of us have a soft spot for Windows 2000, nobody I know that runs Vista has yet to be infected by malware. You?
Similar Threads
-
By cheyenne1212 in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: February 1st, 2012, 02:51 PM
-
By gore in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 11
Last Post: December 29th, 2003, 08:01 AM
-
By tekno in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 61
Last Post: October 15th, 2003, 07:51 AM
-
By xmaddness in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 1
Last Post: October 9th, 2002, 09:21 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|