For starfux0rz

[HYBR|D]

So fine, discuss it. I don't see how the contents of the database relate to that discussion. What's its intent, proof? I'll take your word for it. I don't see a problem with discussion of the methods used and ways they could have been prevented, that's the purpose of the site, but further exposing information that was compromised as a result, that's not only unnecessary to the conversation, it's unwarranted.

To use the info that The-Spec posted a person would have had to crack the hashes.

for instance

lwoods 00f084ea7eb01d821b47058fdfce329a [email protected]

to get into the e-mail account i would 1st need to break the hash string to get the plain password. In it's current format it don't do nothing, so i would need to find out what hash encryptian was used during encryptian (Could it be an md5 hash? ).

It's being posted brings relevance to the discussion at hand, simply because decrpting the hashes and the tools needed & other info can be bought into the discussion, so having the content from the DB posted would serve a purpose to the discussion.

just like when talking about xploit code. There's no use talking about it if there's no example code to look at.