|
-
January 10th, 2012, 07:15 PM
#37
Hi Cider,
This is the 32bit machine, and it is running just fine as I mentioned before. I would say that it is equal in performance to the same rig with XP Pro, and infinitely superior to Vista, which didn't like this outfit at all for some reason. 
I do have those widgets or gadgets enabled............. the two tachometer type dials to show me CPU and RAM usage.
I am very impressed in the way that Windows 8 handles memory management. This machine has 1.5GB of RAM and is using 36% at the moment, and that's with running the Microsoft security, Teatimer, Avira, and WinPatrol.
Best part is, that it releases the memory after .......... Hell! it does the best job of keeping the FireFox memory sow under control that I have seen so far!!!
Now, a slight caveat here as this is 32bit. All I have for comparison is Vista and XP. It certainly outperforms those in this area. The Vista box has 4GB of RAM, of which I think that it "sees" 3.5. It let the memory sow take it up to 52% RAM usage without much else happening 
As for your work, maybe there is a case for a licence, as it does seem to be aimed at the PC ~ sub-PC (touchscreen device) interface? I wouldn't give it to regular static office workers though, as I believe that there will be a pretty seamless interface with Windows 7, given that they seem to be so similar.
I guess we will have a lot of our questions answered with the public beta.
Cheers
Similar Threads
-
By gore in forum Other Tutorials Forum
Replies: 6
Last Post: October 5th, 2004, 08:26 AM
-
By spools.exe in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 3
Last Post: October 4th, 2003, 11:54 PM
-
By warl0ck7 in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: August 14th, 2003, 12:23 PM
-
By Und3ertak3r in forum AntiVirus Discussions
Replies: 0
Last Post: March 10th, 2003, 11:52 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|