|
-
December 30th, 2001, 05:56 PM
#11
You are one stupid jerk. I bet you are such an ugly litle dweeb, all you do all day is beat your meat to online porn. Then you troll the newsgroups looking for something to stir up. I see you do have somewhat of a linear reasoning capacity.The time you have spent TROLLING like the social reject you are must have taught you something.I don't want to pop your bubble but posting to the thread only drives it to the top. But you already know that don't you?What a little bag of putrid pus you are!
I LAUGH at your stupidity. ROTFLMAO
************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Your words are full of sound and fury....but they signify NOTHING
go back to the slow readers group..DUMBASS
-
December 30th, 2001, 06:12 PM
#12
Please, antihaxor, stop this. You're giving them exactly what they want. Quit letting them get to you.
-
December 30th, 2001, 06:55 PM
#13
[QUOTE]Originally posted by shitname
You are one stupid jerk. I bet you are such an ugly litle dweeb, all you do all day is beat your meat to online porn.
You got that from my thread, how am I too assume you do not do this? Well proof, no just childish assumptions.
Then you troll the newsgroups looking for something to stir up.
No other newsgroups would ignore me.
I see you do have somewhat of a linear reasoning capacity.The time you have spent TROLLING like the social reject you are must have taught you something.I don't want to pop your bubble but posting to the thread only drives it to the top. But you already know that don't you?What a little bag of putrid pus you are!
Well please show me your intelligence.
I LAUGH at your stupidity. ROTFLMAO
Yes, yes you do but that my good friend is your own problem, perhaps cannabis induced psychosis.
************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Wow did you do all them stars yourself?
Your words are full of sound and fury....but they signify NOTHING
go back to the slow readers group..DUMBASS
I aint going nowhere, I was here before you kiddio.
Please, antihaxor, stop this. You're giving them exactly what they want. Quit letting them get to you
At least someone has coped on.
Let this be a lesson antihaxor.
-
December 31st, 2001, 02:05 PM
#14
-
December 31st, 2001, 04:39 PM
#15
Variations on the same theme... Part IV
Originally posted by Noble Hamlet
damn you couldnt last in a flame war in a poetry forum, jeez bring back Negative and the old Ennis.
I guess we both have a different opinion on what exactly a flame war is...
1.
How to quote
Why should I place my response below the quoted text?
Usually, the reading-flow is from left to right and from top to bottom, and people expect a chronological sequence similar to this. Especially people who are reading a lot of articles (and who therefore would qualify as the ideal person to answer your question) appreciate it if they can read at first the text to which you are referring. The quoted text is some kind of help to remember the topic, which of course will not work, if you place the quoted text below your response.
Furthermore, that's the standard. This may sound as a weak argument, but since people are not used to reading the other way around, they have no idea what you are referring to and have to go back and forth between the referenced articles, have to jump between different articles and so on. In short - reading the article becomes more and more difficult - for people who read many articles it is reason enough to skip the entire article, if the context is not obvious.
And besides: doesn't it look stupid to first get the answer and then see the question? (Aside from Jeopardy, of course.)
2. I don't shoot the messenger, I shoot the message...
Originally posted by Noble Hamlet
Do you honestly believe that chemical has any morals or values regarding promises?
1. At least some of their posts amused me... I stopped being amused a couple of Noble_Hamlet-threads ago...
2. I'm bored writing this reply... nuff said...
-
December 31st, 2001, 04:54 PM
#16
I guess we both have a different opinion on what exactly a flame war is...
Maybe so.
1. At least some of their posts amused me... I stopped being amused a couple of Noble_Hamlet-threads ago...
2. I'm bored writing this reply... nuff said...
Well you may attempt to discourage me but you will not succeed.
You are held in high regard for your flames but this is perhaps the first show of your demise, your weakness, your lack of ideas.
I dont know perhaps I got bored reading Negative's-threads a long time ago.
-
December 31st, 2001, 05:06 PM
#17
Member
take Noble_Hamlet's keyboard away, pls
yes, your keyboard deserves to be taken away! does a tower crumble because the foundation is bad or because someone is trying to sabatoge it? if the foundation is bad and the mortor is weak then don't stand too close because you'll be buried in the rubble without so much as a memorial to remember you by...why? because you contribute nothing recently but clutter to the forums! i respect a silent reply over that of an overly winded and pointless one. if it's sabatoge, then it will be obvious to all! so stop trying to plant ideas or degrade someone because of their opinion and if chemical wants to change her/his mind then so be it! you could be chemical with a different nick for all we know!
-
December 31st, 2001, 05:45 PM
#18
lmao... hhahaha u guys crack me up...
anyway.. dun worry about chemical.. this is a forum.. which means everyone can have a go to say what they wanna say.. or in this case POST what they wanna POST..
if u dun like da post.. ignore it.. let it drift away to nothingness..
no point in keeping a useless post up in the list by replying to useless flames.. (which i think im doing right now.. hahah)
anyway.. just got down from the roof.. spent my new year there with a ice cold bottle of vodka.. so yeah... HAPPY NEW YEAR.. and have fun d00ds...
-
December 31st, 2001, 05:51 PM
#19
negative
It is amusing how you all have inflated this buffoon's ego and turned him into some mystical esoteric character. Are you all really that impressed with his ability to post in ye old english thanks to an introduction to elizabethan england literature class at his local community college? What else? Because he replaced the word hacker in the 'hacker manifesto' with the word HTMLer; what is an HTMLer? I completely fail to see any humor in his attempted satire. All he is, is a glorified version of Remote Access. Oh and this boy looks like he is what remains of the SS in France.
-
December 31st, 2001, 06:16 PM
#20
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|