Unless the antipoints system has some changes to it as follows, I won't necessarily believe a negative/positive post unless I know the people enough (which is kind of hard on the net):
1: make the post auto-assign the name of whoever's doing it, regardless.
2: make the comment field optional
3: add in a javascript yes/no so that when someone posts either positive or negative, it asks them if they're sure. This is mainly for the negative posts because then it's another step before they shove - points down the line. It might help, or might not.
Anonymous posting is something that's just not conducive to the idea of the points system. And anyone who has to sign someone else's name because they think it's funny is just as bad. If the name is autosigned, it puts a level of honesty on the floor and people might be a little more careful with their postings.
Question: why is it people don't mind signing positive points (most of the time) but 9.99 out of 10 times, they won't sign a name (or even a comment) when assigning negative points?
Disclaimer: this is just my opinion and probably has already been said before.
