objectivity is bullsh$%t
In this context I agree with you (KorpDeath)... American ppl are emotional envolved in this issue more than EU ppl.
I do not know if I would stick to my ethical point of view if I was personally hit by an attack...

Nevertheless ppl should think about what their say (like you posted)
This is a very complex issue:
With lot's of questions:
1) is JW american or not?
2) is JW a war prisoner or normal prisoner?
3) is JW a traitor or not?
4) what are the legal options of the US? Do they have jurisdiction?
5) what are the costs and the profits on short and long run?

When all those questions are answered the appropriate action, determined by a set of rules, has to be taken...

about the AO points: I do not give negative points to any opinion presented here cause everyone has the right to give his/her opinion (freedom of speech).

My opinion is similar to that of Clavin42
"An eye for an eye makes the world blind"