Whichever power source produces the cheapest power
in money terms should be presumed to have the least
total environmental impact, unless you can prove
otherwise. Capitalism always seeks the most profitable
way to supply us with products, and this is morally
superior because the market is ruled by the actions
of consumers seeking the cheapest price.
No other system even comes close.
Environmentalists want to make less electricity
and still make it ridiculously cheap (for themselves)
less gasoline, less tuna.
Who cares if the "working class", can't afford the
dolphin free tuna?
Who cares if the rednecks all starve?
They're living in a fantasy, hoping to live in luxury
in a depopulated earth listening to their
old beatle records.
