Very good post, if the Moon landings didn't take place, covering that up is one major security job.
My 4 1/2 cents.


Lets face it, there isn't really a heapload of evidence that we didn't go to the moon. Why would there be? NASA doesn't WANT evidence that we went to the moon. NASA wants people not to ask questions, and keep living their happy little lives. But here is some evidence that you cannot argue with. My theory is that the moon landing were set on a sound stage, not in space. (Perhaps an Air Force base near San Bernardino, called Norton Air Force Base, where they have the world's largest sound stages under tremendously efficient security).
The U.S.S.R. would have disputed the U.S.A.'s claim, unless the U.S.S.R. & the U.S. worked something out at the height of the cold war.


On the moon, there is only one light source, the sun. Shots of Buzz Aldrin and Neal Armstrong planting the US flag on the moon. If the sun is the only light source used by NASA on the moon, Aldrins shadow shadows should not be so much longer than Armstrong's yet they are by far.

The Earth will cast reflected light from the Sun onto the moon, as will any light used by the guys there.Then there is light from the Sun & Earth(see above) reflecting of the Lander & other such stuff that would also add to extra weird light.


if you look in areas 6 and J , you will again see no stars. In area K you will notice that one side of the LEM in covered in shadow, but somehow the symbol of the US flag in illuminated. This very well could have been a touch up job http://batesmotel.8m.com/nasa7.gif
No stars, the photogragh's are'nt exposed long enough, You try take a picture of the stars.
Its also daytime on the moon thus the Sun glare will dim the stars a bit.


Then again I may be wrong.