|
-
May 30th, 2002, 04:09 PM
#11
tyger_claw> I am not sad at all. I think it is sad that people are that ignorant that they would write a petition like that though.
Anyone see spiderman? There was supposed to be a scene near the end where spidey was in a giant web between the twin towers. Originally they were going to delete it, then they decided to keep it in, then they decided to delete it, and about 2 weeks before the movie came out, they said the sceen was staying in the movie. Well, obviously the sceen isn't there now, so.....
The spiderman thing is understandable (yet still stupid), but messing with something from over 20 years ago is just rediciulus. I think we should take all new $20 bills out of circulation now that someone has found a way to fold the bill and you can see the towers and pentagon burning. Anyone who agrees with me can just mail me all there new $20 bills, and I will make sure that they are properly taken care of
\"Ignorance is bliss....
but only for your enemy\"
-- souleman
-
May 30th, 2002, 04:11 PM
#12
\"\"A weak mind is like a microscope, which magnifies trifling things but cannot receive great ones.\" — G.K. Chesterton, 19th-century English essayist and poet\"
-
May 30th, 2002, 04:40 PM
#13
Senior Member
Everything today is related to 9/11. Ingorance....it gets most, and when it does, it grows.
[gloworange]Die, or surrender, either way won\'t work.[/gloworange]
[shadow]HuntX7[/shadow]

-
May 30th, 2002, 04:47 PM
#14
I have to agree...that is sad. To respond so emotionally to words is in human nature...unfortunately.
People will always find something to be upset/offended by (ie-when I was in High School one of our yearbooks had a midevil theme...the teacher who had advised the yearbook staff that year had to deal with a group of parents that decided it was satanic.)
Sorry bout the tangent, it's just one more example of people having to little of importance in their lives and trying to make an issue out of something that isn't in order to feel self-riotous.
Faqt
If you want to make God laugh....make plans.
-
May 30th, 2002, 05:04 PM
#15
Faqt> I agree completely. Why else would i have started this thread in the first place
\"Ignorance is bliss....
but only for your enemy\"
-- souleman
-
May 30th, 2002, 05:15 PM
#16
Heh thats not only sad, thats lame. I know many people have been hurt, but why should we petition them to change the name? If you hate the name so much, boycott the movie, but a petition? Get real... Better yet, get a life.
[shadow]uraloony, Founder of Loony Services[/shadow]
Visit us at
[gloworange]http://www.loonyservices.com/[/gloworange]
-
May 30th, 2002, 05:51 PM
#17
Member
I agree
I agree with you, souleman, as well as with many other posters. if these people are so angry over the movie title, why not be angry over the book title as well? why not be angry about all the made-for-tv movies about 9/11 coming out?
I stab you with an umbrella and then open it! Cuz I\'m sick like a diseased Ethiopian!
-ICP
Who\'s goin next, I\'m dyin to see, Spin The Bottle baby and give it to me!!
-Twiztid
-
May 30th, 2002, 05:59 PM
#18
Wtf?
They can't change the name of the film, thats what the goddam books called!
F***ing hell, when will these people *Move* *On* ??
-
May 30th, 2002, 06:15 PM
#19
F***ing hell, when will these people *Move* *On* ??
I think this may be asking a bit much of people. It would be very hard to just "move on" if something like this had cost you your spouse/parent/child. From a psychological standpoint, this event was more traumatic than anything a lot of us will ever have to deal with in our lives.
However, there does come a point when it's pushed too far. I think expecting the title of a book written 27 years before an event occurs is pushing it way too far. I haven't read the Lord of the Rings (please don't hate me...lol) or seen the movie, but from my understanding, it doesn't even deal with NYC, does it? It's just like anything else, you have people who are going to protest ANYTHING that comes along, and then you have the ones who jump on the bandwagon behind them.
I also think that some of the TV networks may be pushing their luck with the made-for-TV movies. It's too early for that crap. It hasn't even been a year, and I think they may face a backlash they aren't expecting.
Deb
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read.
-
May 30th, 2002, 07:00 PM
#20
Hey ya'll. Might want to sharpen your pencils.
The Hobbit: or There and Back Again. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1937. (There was a second edition in 1951, and a third in 1966. Reprinted many times.) The Annotated Hobbit, Introduction and Notes by Douglas A. Anderson, Houghton Mifflin, Boston and HarperCollins, London, 1988.
The Fellowship of the Ring: being the first part of The Lord of the Rings. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1954.
The Two Towers: being the second part of The Lord of the Rings. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1954.
This makes them look even more ludicrous.
"This is what happens when you take a fool and add a bleeding heart." -KorpDeath
source: http://www.tolkiensociety.org/tolkien/index.html
Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it.
- Samuel Johnson
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|