My take on it is that if that bandwidth caps should be evil. Rather, you should be marketed with a certain amount of 'assured' bandwidth, (for which they will reimburse you if you consistently don't get it.), and that if there is unused capacity, share it among the users. I don't condemn people who may trick the companies into removing caps, so long as they don't inconvenience other users by draining THEIR bandwidth.

In this case, I'm glad these guys were busted, *IF* they did anything else but take purely unused capacity.