ok one more thing that i got to say...... the reason most newbies would be flamed for complaining about antipoints is because most newbies post stupid **** and dont deserve antipoints, i would NEVER flame a newbie who actualy posted decent posts and deserved the antipoints he/she got.

I just dont agree with the way the system is at the moment, just because the post isnt "long enough" or with enough "usefull information" does NOT mean its NEGATIVE, and same goes for posative just because the person is your friend he/she SHOULDNT get greens for everything that they post. Again, im saying i think if he wants to keep the whole "balence is key" deal then he should make a "neutral" point that will help you balance your mete instead of having to give negs to people who dont deserve them.

I mean negative antipoints are made to seperate the helpfull people from the lamers right?? Well if we "balance" everyone out we will all be on the same level and it will be like we are back on page 1.
I dont agree with most of you and i am going to back my opinion 100%.

And i got a Negative Antipoint from someone who did sign it today and i agreed with the way they did it, they didnt agree with me so they gave me a neg, thats 100% fine, but when i get a negative antipoiont saying "you have too much green, just evening it out" I really dont agree with that, especialy when its not signed.

Again, this is an opinion, and everyone is entitlded to one.