Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Pulling WEP KEYs/MAC FILTER From Linksys/D-link ect

  1. March 17th, 2003, 05:43 PM #11
    d0ppelg@nger
    d0ppelg@nger is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    99
    Which bank????? J/K.....
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. March 17th, 2003, 07:28 PM #12
    avenger_jcc
    avenger_jcc is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    518
    lol hehe
    dont think so. If anyone were to rob it Id be the FIRST one they looked at as Ive pointed this out before.
    I tried compiling that code too and ran into issues, but havent sat down to really look it over yet
    Remember -
    The ark was built by amatures...
    The Titanic was built by professionals.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. March 17th, 2003, 11:32 PM #13
    devilbile
    devilbile is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    7
    I really REALLY appreciate you guys taking the time and lending me a hand with this code. Atleast I'm not the only one having problems with this code. I too am running Slackware but it's v8.1. Anyways, I guess I'm gonna have to buy a book on C to figure out why this junk isn't compiling properly.

    my girlfriend thanks all you guys too, for helping me be a "bigger dork" ... hmph thanks guys

    keep in mind that this exploit is only usefull if you are associated with the Access Point, meaning you are still gonna have to either hack WEP or MAC Filters, maybe both to gain access to the WLAN before you can actually get this info. It would be possible for an attacker to get physical access to your wired network and send a broadcast out (this exploit) asking for all your wireless access points info. So a possible security measure would be to place a firewall or router between your WLAN and LAN keeping the broadcast domains seperate.

    Thanks again guys
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. March 18th, 2003, 06:36 AM #14
    devilbile
    devilbile is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    7
    BINGO,

    The exploit on that website wasn't spaced properly! I found another copy of the exploit on the web which would compile and execute properly, when comparing the two, the only difference was the spacing... LOL
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. March 18th, 2003, 09:59 AM #15
    the_JinX
    the_JinX is offline
    Leftie Linux Lover the_JinX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Beverwijk Netherlands
    Posts
    2,534
    C and C++ are not space sencitive!!!

    take a look at some of the source codes on this website !!

    But I don't have the time to look into it atm..

    I think there must have been some other small difference . .
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI.
    When in Russia, pet a PETSCII.
    Get your ass over to SLAYRadio the best station for C64 Remixes !
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. March 18th, 2003, 04:58 PM #16
    devilbile
    devilbile is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    7
    holy crap! That is a very interesting site, so I'll go out on a limb and say that it may not of been spacing which caused the compiling problem. However, I'm betting it is a formatting problem somewhere along the code, because I've typed in that code from the secureiteam.com website character by character and it compiled and executed.

    Note that both versions of the code gave the compiler a fit with the "sendto" statement something about illegal pointer.

    I'll take a look at the code tonight, we shall get to the bottom of this!

    lata
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules