Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Port scanning trouble?

  1. #11
    Senior Member tampabay420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    953
    i'm sorry i should of made my opinion more clear...
    i don't part. like the Fancy front end, as apposed to the
    console mode version...
    + i like to "nmap host > log.txt"

    /edit -> kinda funny, i found this on nmap.org
    Code:
    POPULAR SITE SNAPSHOTS
    
    Here is the fun result of all our effort.  We can now take random
    Internet sites and determine what OS they are using.  A lot of these
    people have eliminated telnet banners, etc. to keep this information
    private.  But this is of no use with our new fingerprinter!  Also
    this is a good way to expose the <your favorite crap OS> users as the
    lamers that they are :)!
    
    The command used in these examples was: nmap -sS -p 80 -O -v <host>
    
    Also note that most of these scans were done on 10/18/98.  Some of
    these folks may have upgraded/changed servers since then.
    
    Note that I do not like every site on here.  
    
    # "Hacker" sites or (in a couple cases) sites that think they are
    www.l0pht.com        => OpenBSD 2.2 - 2.4
    www.insecure.org     => Linux 2.0.31-34
    www.rhino9.ml.org    => Windows 95/NT     # No comment :-)
    www.technotronic.com => Linux 2.0.31-34
    www.nmrc.org         => FreeBSD 2.2.6 - 3.0
    www.cultdeadcow.com  => OpenBSD 2.2 - 2.4
    www.kevinmitnick.com => Linux 2.0.31-34  # Free Kevin!
    www.2600.com         => FreeBSD 2.2.6 - 3.0 Beta
    www.antionline.com   => FreeBSD 2.2.6 - 3.0 Beta
    www.rootshell.com    => Linux 2.0.35  # Changed to OpenBSD after
                                          # they got owned.
    
    # Security vendors, consultants, etc.
    www.repsec.com       => Linux 2.0.35
    www.iss.net          => Linux 2.0.31-34
    www.checkpoint.com   => Solaris 2.5 - 2.51
    www.infowar.com      => Win95/NT
    
    # Vendor loyalty to their OS
    www.li.org           => Linux 2.0.35 # Linux International
    www.redhat.com       => Linux 2.0.31-34 # I wonder what distribution :-)
    www.debian.org       => Linux 2.0.35
    www.linux.org        => Linux 2.1.122 - 2.1.126
    www.sgi.com          => IRIX 6.2 - 6.4
    www.netbsd.org       => NetBSD 1.3X
    www.openbsd.org      => Solaris 2.6     # Ahem :-) (its because UAlberta 
                                            # is hosting them)
    www.freebsd.org      => FreeBSD 2.2.6-3.0 Beta
    
    # Ivy league
    www.harvard.edu      => Solaris 2.6
    www.yale.edu         => Solaris 2.5 - 2.51
    www.caltech.edu      => SunOS 4.1.2-4.1.4  # Hello! This is the 90's :-)   
    www.stanford.edu     => Solaris 2.6
    www.mit.edu          => Solaris 2.5 - 2.51 # Coincidence that so many good
                                               # schools seem to like Sun?
                                               # Perhaps it is the 40%
                                               # .edu discount :-)
    www.berkeley.edu     => UNIX OSF1 V 4.0,4.0B,4.0D  
    www.oxford.edu       => Linux 2.0.33-34  # Rock on!
    
    # Lamer sites
    www.aol.com          => IRIX 6.2 - 6.4  # No wonder they are so insecure :-)
    www.happyhacker.org  => OpenBSD 2.2-2.4 # Sick of being owned, Carolyn?
                                            # Even the most secure OS is
                                            # useless in the hands of an
                                            # incompetent admin.
    
    # Misc
    www.lwn.net          => Linux 2.0.31-34 # This Linux news site rocks!
    www.slashdot.org     => Linux 2.1.122 - 2.1.126
    www.whitehouse.gov   => IRIX 5.3
    sunsite.unc.edu      => Solaris 2.6
    - excuse me for always using the 'code' tag, i like the way it formats the text
    yeah, I\'m gonna need that by friday...

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    3,747
    I use Nmap every once and a while but some times have problems with it and have to have it not ping when it checks a address. It hasn't realy worked out well for me. It does however have a easy to use interface.
    =

  3. #13
    Antionline Herpetologist
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,165
    Thought NMap for Windows doesn't work on loopback interfaces, you can get it to work by specifying your actual IP.
    Cheers,
    cgkanchi
    Buy the Snakes of India book, support research and education (sorry the website has been discontinued)
    My blog: http://biology000.blogspot.com

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    170
    Well anyways thanks everyone I found it and got it working. I'm new to portscanning, but all your replies helped me a lot.

    >Thanks
    [glowpurple]NooNoo\'s [/glowpurple]

  5. #15
    Jaded Network Admin nebulus200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    1,356
    If you just want to test if one port is open (and don't really care about the rest), just telnet or netcat to that port, if you get a 'connected' then it is open, if you get a 'refused or closed' then it isn't, no need to bother with a fancy scanner like nmap...

    /nebulus
    There is only one constant, one universal, it is the only real truth: causality. Action. Reaction. Cause and effect...There is no escape from it, we are forever slaves to it. Our only hope, our only peace is to understand it, to understand the 'why'. 'Why' is what separates us from them, you from me. 'Why' is the only real social power, without it you are powerless.

    (Merovingian - Matrix Reloaded)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •