The tech buble happened almost 20 years after regans policies, when clinton took office the econamy was an abosolute mess. If what you are saying is true then the tech buble burst and our current economic down turn is bush seniors fault and we will have to wait 12 more years to see the effects taht clinton had. Add that to the fact that clinton wasn't elected in a time of a good econamy, he inharetid a bad one and it didn't get better untill his second term. I agree that it takes time for economic changes to take effect but I doubt it takes 12+ years for it to happen.

If he said that bush seniors econamy was the fault of regan I would by that, and the first clinton term was from bush I would by that, but not clintons second term being effected by regans first term, that dosn't work.

We also must look at the econamy when clinton took office for his first term, it was crap, more over his econmic plans where vastly difrent then regans why would anyone who liked regans econamy vote for clinton. why would anyone who was happy with the econamy at the time not vote for bush his argument is ludicris.