View Poll Results: What is the best IDS you have ever used?
- Voters
- 27. You may not vote on this poll
-
NetDetector
-
SHADOW
-
Snort
-
ISS Real Secure
-
Cisco Secure IDS
-
BlackICE
-
November 11th, 2003, 05:29 PM
#81
Normally I'm a fast reader, but when it comes to reading bballad's replies it becomes a 5 min guessing game to try and figure out what you are typing. Can you please hit spell check x5 once in while?!
If bballad had it his way, we would never fight any wars (against terrorist and dictators, neel, you dumbass), we would just simply roll over and play dead. What a dumb ass way of thinking bballad. If this country was in your hands during World War II we would all be speaking German and wearing chains that Hitler himself bound upon our legs and arms.
When will Liberals like you learn bballad, when all of us are dead because of your miserable failures and ideals?!?
-
November 11th, 2003, 05:43 PM
#82
I don't know anyone who doesn't respect the soldiers who died in the world wars, you'd stab alot of people really close to the hard by saying we're ungreatfull. The main reason I disregard it is because helping us once doesn't justify something 50 years later. The people who lived and ruled back then are dead or pretty old by now. I didn't live in a worldwar and you didn't either. Besides that, with aldue respect, the US entered the world war after they got attacked. They didn't have the intention to get involved in the war at all at the start.
disclaimer:
the stuff below doesn't nessesarily reflect my opinion on whatever
well there's a rule about using nazi stuff in a discussion... now I could aswell screw this totally:
/|Glacier|\ like fighting wars and you will be victorious eh...? ey, that reminds me of someone:
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/pt-2703-75dpi.jpg
der sieg wird unser sein! == we will be victorious!
war war war:
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/pt-2601-75dpi.jpeg
talking about nationalism:
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/adolf-5-75dpi.jpg
compare to your sig:
http://www.ezart.com/flag/usa-07.gif
discrimination (half of all the history I had about the US was about discrimination of some kind):
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/dualsti-150dpi.jpg
the new order:
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/TNOMasthead75dpi.jpg
source:
typed in nsdap in google first link:
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com/
-
November 11th, 2003, 06:11 PM
#83
Yet another ungratefull piece of EURO TRASH your grandmother probably slept with the nazi's in WWII .While my grandfather was storming the beach of NORMANDY.
You can post all that ANTI-AMERICAN trash all you want but your just proving my point about the FRENCH & GERMANS ideals.
Remember the American blood that was shed on the beach during D-DAY. So your grandmother could sleep with the nazi's . You Nazi ****!
-
November 11th, 2003, 06:13 PM
#84
I was trying to point out you're more a nazi then hitler himself was...
-
November 11th, 2003, 06:24 PM
#85
Senior Member
So, America was wrong to go to war in Iraq before they gave WMD's to terrorists to attack us, preemption, and was wrong to not to go to war until they were actually attacked in WWII, causing many more innocent deaths? Jeez, neel, make up your mind! Is war only wrong when it's our security and is only right when it's yours? How do you know husein wasn't the next hitler? If saddam was left to his own devices and later gave weapons to anti-Belgiumese terrorists who decided to gas your capitol, you'd want US support, wouldn't you? With all the evidence, the satellite photos, the intelligence, he had weapons and was a threat that needed to be dealt with before he killed any more.
//Edit: Sure, we have atempted to kill an entire race, we have invaded half of Europe, we're the nazis. I think Glacier was onto somthing with that last post.
-
November 11th, 2003, 06:38 PM
#86
I said the US attacked after they got attacked. I did NOT say that was wrong! I wanted to point out the US's main reason was not to free us. Freeing us was almost like a nice side effect of defeating germany. They didn't want to get involved in the year before that, while germany was taking over europe.
I also did NOT say to just wait till we got attacked by sadaam. I wanted to point out sadaam was recognised as a threat by nato navo un (I always mix them up) who were buisy proving the facts the US threw up. *IF* they'd ever have found weapons I probably wouldn't discuss this, but the US used it's position to start a war of wich every other nation would've had to pay for with it's life. Iraq wasn't even proven a threat to the US or any other nation and they still didn't find the weapons nor sadaam.
English is my fourth language so don't attack me on grammatical errors wich might have twisted my words in the wrong direction.
//Edit: forget the glacier stuff and my replies to him in the debate, read the disclaimer and all... I don't want to compare the US to nazies, I wanted to react to glaciers flame
-
November 11th, 2003, 07:13 PM
#87
Senior Member
Besides that, with aldue respect, the US entered the world war after they got attacked. They didn't have the intention to get involved in the war at all at the start.
I don't know if that's another grammatical error, but it sounds that the US would have been right to attack to protect your national security and should have done so at the beginning. But, if that's so, why didn't the rest of the world help with Iraq at the start to protect our national security, if that's what you expect from us? Also, Mr. Powell presented his evidence to the UN February 5, 2003. War started March 20, 2003. That's just over a month and a half to verify the evidence. But, remember, the UN is incompetent and can't enforce it's own resolutions, so that's not enough time to watch trafic from the areas in the photos to make sure they weren't being moved and inspect them before Saddam, who wasn't at the UN meeting, knew they were coming and hid them? Not only that, but in 12+ years they've been there they haven't found a thing, but we were able to pick them out FROM SPACE! That really inspires confidence in me for the rest of the world and the UN and NATO.
BTW, good, because if you were I might take offense Yeah, his comments were unnacceptable and a reaction from you was fully warrented. But still, I don't take kindly to that anti-American crap.
-
November 11th, 2003, 11:17 PM
#88
BY Neel
The US only got the powerfull status they have now because of the world wars and the cold war. They were not the 'ubernation' for the past 200 years.
Wow we are a new country did that ever ring a bell to you. We are the only super power left on the earth and will allways be. In about 5 years or so, Ronald Reagan's brilliant STAR WARS missile defense plan will be in full affect.
THEL Success: Joint Israel-U.S. Laser Shoots Down Rocket in Second Test, June 2000
http://www.jinsa.org/articles/articl.../3,646,152,961
http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/factsheets/abl.html
Sing it with me guys!!!!!!.....even you Bballad your still an american right?
And I’m proud to be an American,
where at least I know I’m free.
And I wont forget the men who died,
who gave that right to me.
And I gladly stand up,
next to you and defend her still today.
‘Cause there ain’t no doubt I love this land,
God bless the USA.
God bless the USA , Israel & are other true allies
-
November 19th, 2003, 04:33 PM
#89
Junior Member
As A Canadian, my opinion probably dosen't matter as much, but I think he dosen't make a good President at all. He's too right-winged; the tax breakes were only for the rich, and Iraq was wasn't a war at all; it was a sloughter.
He wants to turn a part of a nature reserve in Alaska into an oil operation, and has no regard for wildlife at all.
Come next November, I hope Ralph Nader wins.
That's my opinion, anyways.
-Julien
-
November 19th, 2003, 07:19 PM
#90
Senior Member
Sorry, but I don't see Nader winning until maybe the next... never!!!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|