bballad, I don't watch fox. I don't have a tv in fact only a monitor to watch DVDs and sometimes I may watch a fuzzy PBS show (Ok I guess I do have a tv just not hooked up). If I said soldiers were running around eating babies for food because I support there death and demise as well as the humiliation of the country I hate, I wouldn't expect you to believe it. I also wouldn't expect you to accept it for truth if is was only a few stories out of hundreds of thousands of people all over the country. If that was the case I would assume the entire muslum continent to be filled with the same insanity those men have who hacked away a human life behind masks. I would make the conclusion that they are all like that because that might be what I want, I may want a result and then look for any scrap of information to support it, instead of having an open mind and filtering data based on evidence.

I should watch Fox though, since all the liberal blogs bash it along with everything else they hate, which is an ever increasing list I find daily.

BBC is a good source if they list who it came from and not just carrying something with no real source attached. The truth is bballad an abulance got shot in what the blogs call "the most bloodiest battle since the end of major hostility." They "think" is was by the US and I still claim that someone shooting at that **** for fun is an ******* and should be handed over to Iraqi police along with the prisoners Al Quida wants. They would probably execute them all. A soldier shooting an ambulance defies logic, even in a hardened combat zone. There just is not conclusive way to tell who did it, at least enough to draw up evidence to prosecute. That article is a few weeks old.

Perhaps if the snipers stopped the ambulance, cut out the baby with a knife and cooked it on TV you would have a better stance in your point.