I don't normally bring up Limbaugh in my posts, however I must say that Limbaugh made a very valid point yesterday about the entire photo ordeal.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/dai...t_2.guest.html

Alot of this article rambles, but the basic gist of the article is that Congress is claiming to be shocked and disturbed by the photos, while at the same time Congress funds photos of a very similar nature and applauds these photos as art under freedom of speech. I don't agree with Limbaugh's assessment, but it does make you stop and think for a minute........You can find numerous examples sites that claim to be genuine "forced rape" sites and "mutilation" sites on the Internet, however the participants are hopefully voluntary, thus a significant distinction between the events that occured in the Iraqi prison.

That being said, if these same photos were compiled and made into a display where a conscientious objector to war followed the mobile vietnam wall display around and set up shop a few feet away at each location; I have no doubt in my mind that Congress would in fact fund the project as freedom of speech display, and would state that the pictures should be considered "artwork," which is a mode of expressing political opposition.

Limbaugh is correct in one aspect here though, with that being that the Liberals essentially want to have their cake and eat it too, where these photos are concerned. If you are outraged and disgusted at one display of smut an abuse, shouldn't you be outraged and disgusted at all similar displays of smut and abuse? This is because the acceptance of the images in everyday society is what erodes away at the morals of are children. Liberals are trying to project sensitivity by being appalled at these photos, while visiting their PORNHOLIO sites and getting their jollies from the very same type of content.