|
-
May 25th, 2004, 04:04 AM
#41
So it was Saddam's government who did it? Which is the only logical answer, with all of the black market to terrorist trades going on.
News Flash: Saddam's Government doesn't exist anymore. Are you really that stupid? If you think thats the only logical answer...then you seriously gotta start reading the news kid.
Are you denying the fact that perhaps they were placed there by the "GUERRILLA" forces that are fighting againts the US?
-
May 25th, 2004, 02:46 PM
#42
amazeingly asbat-ansar, dosn't seem to have a link to husain, in fact the CIA seems to list them as small uneffective procupied with internal house keeping...big threat there. Lokk in the 90's hussain started to make connections with the PLO, spacificly a secular branch, the distruction of his secrate poliece headcourters by clinton put a stop to that. THe fact remains that the only terrorist group operating in iraq before this war was allied with the kurds our allies. Hussain was a secular leader who hated and was hated by the islamists, al of the middle east terrorist groups are islamists.
Who is more trustworthy then all of the gurus or Buddha’s?
-
May 25th, 2004, 03:56 PM
#43
As far as I can see the main reason that bush went into iraq is because he though it was a soft target. A quick in, set up a goverement and everyone home for the 4 of july.
If he was so dedicated to stopping state sponsored terrorisim that he was willing to go war with an independant country. that had at best shaky links to terrorist groups. why didnt he just attack Iran and hit islamic terrorist where it would hurt them.
\"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.\"
\"The reason we are so pleased to find other people\'s secrets is that it distracts public attention from our own.\"
Oscar Wilde(1854-1900)

-
May 25th, 2004, 04:49 PM
#44
Damn Muracu, you hit it on the head. My take all along. Iraq was a soft target, perhaps if the world grew some willpower and guts we would be on to Iran with the will of people united instead of bickering over BS all the time and making no sense from week to week while they change their puny minds. Why is it so difficult to understand that until they are beaten, more planes will be crashed, more trains exploded and more people tortured in the name of ALAH and their ****ed up Jihad.
bballad if you are going to "look into the 90s" better stand up and mention Al Quida and our mutual shite head, Osama Bin Laden. Because FACT: he was there. Sugar coat it all you want, the dude was in the country doing his th'ang. No one has proved for sure he had camps there, but he was there a while. What was he doing parking cars? Your statement about Iraq being some separatist movement in the Arab Islamic world is bogus. I’ll be brief: Saddam has defied the west and spit at the UN. In fact in their eyes, he defeated the West because mammas boys would not support the removal of Saddam at the time, so he retained power and thus defeated the evil United States.
Syria is a sponsor of terrorism and has been for decades, in fact the Baath (yep same) party is in power there, and they are ruthless at controlling any threat to it’s power. The Syrians have not been as bold as the Iraqis so they are still there (See note above about attacking Iran.). They Iraq and Syria became better buddies after 1991 and there are concrete ties to money and goods rolling back and forth for decades, especially after da war by daddy Bush. Iran, Turkey, Israel, and Saudi Arabia are different stories, but I challenge the notion that Islamic extremists hate the leader of Iraq because he is secular. They hate them ALL, because to their Islamic Belief system the leaders of Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel, etc. etc. are CORRUPT. They compromise and find refuge in these places anyway because that is all they have and they usually perform some sort of service to the thugs who tolerate their existence. Interestingly enough Al Quida got its start in Syria as Moslum (Muslim) Brotherhood. As you can tell I am no fan of the Hussein or Assad (Syria) families. It’s seems easy to call Bush a dictator and a Nazi and look at these families and have pity when one has no clue about the world. In general terms.
Interesting enough Iran shows future promise, the youth in Iran of overly zealous of their subtle rebellion against the Iron will the Ayatullah.
The Kurds are our allies, but the PKK is not. Unless you support their methods of murdering corporate executives.
West of House
You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.
There is a small mailbox here.
-
May 25th, 2004, 08:15 PM
#45
again road, osma hated hussain, his organization got its start outside of afganistan as a force to distroy hussain how is it so hard for you to understand.
Who is more trustworthy then all of the gurus or Buddha’s?
-
May 25th, 2004, 09:17 PM
#46
Junior Member
amazeingly asbat-ansar, dosn't seem to have a link to husain, in fact the CIA seems to list them as small uneffective procupied with internal house keeping...big threat there. Lokk in the 90's hussain started to make connections with the PLO, spacificly a secular branch, the distruction of his secrate poliece headcourters by clinton put a stop to that. THe fact remains that the only terrorist group operating in iraq before this war was allied with the kurds our allies. Hussain was a secular leader who hated and was hated by the islamists, al of the middle east terrorist groups are islamists.
bballad
I may have missed typed ‘Asbat al-Ansar .
It was supposed to be Ansar al-Islam.
(I was doing this from direct memory and I might have gotten the names mixed up)
History lesson on Ansar al-Islam before SH's fall
General
Ansar al-Islam is a radical Kurdish Islamic group that is supportive of Saddam Hussein's regime. This group is located in the pseudo-autonomous Northern Iraq. This group has ties with Taliban and al-Qaeda. It is the most radical group operating in the Iraqi Kurdistan region.
Activities
Ansar al-Islam recent activities include: razing of beauty salons, burning a schools for girls, and murdered women in the streets for refusing to wear the burqa. It has seized a Taliban-style enclave of 4,000 civilians and several villages near the Iranian border. It is also responsible for ambushing and killing of 42 Kurdish soldiers. Ansar al-Islam is in a state of war with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). It was responsible for the assassination in 2001 of a senior official of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), Franso Hariri, and for the attempted killing of Burhan Salih, head of the PUK-led Iraqi Kurdistan regional government. However, Ansar al-Islam is not in armed confrontation with the KDP.
Strength
About 700 - 1000 members
Additional Info
According to reports, the group has received at least $600,000 from al-Qaeda, and a delivery of weapons and Toyota Land Cruisers. There are also reports stating that Ansar al-Islam received $35,000 from the Mukhabarat branch of Iraqi Intelligence Service, in addition to a considerable quantity of arms. The leader of Ansar al-Islam, Mullah Krekar has been captured in September of 2002.
Do you know who's in charge now? I do.
Honesty
Everyone wants to know it but nobody wants to hear it.
-
May 25th, 2004, 09:33 PM
#47
Junior Member
again road, osma hated hussain, his organization got its start outside of afganistan as a force to distroy hussain how is it so hard for you to understand.
The force got its start to fight the Russians not Saddam.
Honesty
Everyone wants to know it but nobody wants to hear it.
-
May 25th, 2004, 09:41 PM
#48
lol it's easy to understand that after 1991 Syria and Iraq became best friends. They worked very close together. Where was Osama at this time? In Syria? Sudan? Iraq? After the 80s it was Sudan then Afghanistan. Both countries have roots in the same party and both parties rose to power and induced a stronghold on each respective country.
Osama didn't form his union with terrorism to behead Hussein. He supported the mujahedeen to eliminate Soviet Occupation of Afghanistan. You see he hates the Saudi's just as much. That is the point I made, I don't think you picked up on it. He hates them all, that's what Al Quida is all about besides killing Americans they want to remove all the corrupt leaders of Islam. That is everyone except what was the Taliban. They are the "righteous" sort he loves.
After the Soviets left Afghanistan the Saudi people applauded him as a hero, he turned back non-Muslim aggression. It was the first war in Iraq that turned Al Quida’s eye. He went from mujahedeen to MAK to al-Quida. (note that MAK is the CIA link to his training) But it wasn’t the actual war that turned him, it was the dependence Saudi Arabia has on the USA. We are QUILTY of supporting what he views as a corrupt monarchy that turned him against us. **** all we had to do was leave Saudi Arabia and let him roll over the governing body and 9/11 would have happened? If one is going to keep that line of thinking, at least get it right. That being if we leave them alone, they will leave us alone thing.
He doesn’t hate Saddam half as much as the monarchy of Saudi Arabia and the United States. At least not anymore than the President of Iran or the Sudanese So I tried to say, to think Al Quida didn’t have influence in Iraq because he hates Saddam is BS. In fact most of the anti-war propaganda I see around comes straight from his mouth and is picked up across the globe. In some cases I see people regurgitating what he has said.
I am not making a case for war. I have stated many times my case for war isn’t related to Al Quida, it’s related to opportunity. A cannot recall a time where Osama ever targeted Hussein. I also cannot set here and imagine Al Quida, a world dominant terror organization with followers all over the world didn’t operate inside Iraq. I just can’t comprehend that.
West of House
You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.
There is a small mailbox here.
-
May 25th, 2004, 10:44 PM
#49
Senior Member
Originally posted here by Cybr1d
News Flash: Saddam's Government doesn't exist anymore. Are you really that stupid? If you think thats the only logical answer...then you seriously gotta start reading the news kid.
Are you denying the fact that perhaps they were placed there by the "GUERRILLA" forces that are fighting againts the US?
I know it doesn't exist, I wasn't using present tense.
I was being sarcastic with it being the only logical answer, meaning that I am supporting my point that it may have been not only made, but placed there by those in terrorist orginizations, the black market, or yes even the "GUERRILLAS."
-
May 25th, 2004, 11:13 PM
#50
do you even know what the black market is?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|