Yup, a mod's spoken. At least there is a clear indication of what is acceptable as a tutorial here.
That being said, I would still like to see this tutorial completed as I feel it is very lacking in an explanation of the processes involved in performing all of the mentioned attacks and perhaps one or two explored directly by the author of the tutorial.
That's a rather extremist way of viewing what Juridian said. "Make it better" does not necessarily equate to "Give a complete 100% detailed explanation of the software/technology/whatever including background information on its formation, a complete history, etc".Originally posted by: Pooh Sun Tzu
Wait, so are you saying a tutorial has to include 100% every single bit of information ever known to man on a particular subject? That the one posting the tutorial has to know the current subject from top to bottom, have invented it, and then patented it?
AngelicKnight, I did read your post, I just don't believe it applied here.
Reply With Quote