For those of you who agree that this information should be published, let us look at this from a light that shines closer to home.

The scenario:

A child rapist/murderer has been active in your home town or urban area. Now in all fairness to freedom of the press, a journalist pulls the following information about the all of the children in the local area: names, ages, addresses, school bus numbers, where they like to play, number of parents /w occupations and hours of employment, and the general conditions where the children may be left at home alone; and this journalist prints all of this information in the local newspaper, making it much easier to kidnap, molest, and kill your child, brother, or sister as the case may be. Sure the sicko that is plaguing the area could find out all of this information on his own, but remember this is freedom of the press! It doesn't matter whose life is endangered as long as you are not targeting a minority group, where the article can be mistrued as a hate speech.

If you still think this it is a good idea to print the location of our vice-president during a national crisis, you really need to seek medical help.