View Poll Results: should i tell him
- Voters
- 3. You may not vote on this poll
-
August 31st, 2004, 06:36 PM
#61
Cybr1d > Ain't it cool how now that you don't live in Albania anymore you can afford to say "F* the UN"? I'm sure you wouldn't say that living in Albania
Sure I would. **** the UN . I'm not concerned only about 1 country Negative. If they've helped Albania, doesn't mean I'll bend over backwards for them when it comes to screwing someone else. BTW if you're going to get into the Kosovo deal, Albania and Kosovo are 2 different countries ...Depending on Kosovo's interest, they call themselves Albanian when its best for them, and screw us over any other time. Besides Albania has been in the UN since 1955....
Yeah yeah "With great power comes great responsibility".. not in this case. We don't have the right to police the world.. period. Just because we can whoop the worlds ass if they disagree with us doesnt give us the right.
How is it not in this case? So you'd rather sit back and watch? No we do not whoop their ass if they disagree...sheesh, where do you get these Ideas? Its hard enough to convince the world that we're not bullies and now we have Americans think that the US is bullying the world...dude get your head out fo the gutter.
You misunderstood me. The U.N (United Nations? Duh..?) should determine whos a problem in this world since reps from every country (close to it) are in the UN. I'd rather that oppose to the U.S determining it since the U.S is only ONE country.
The US is the One Country with the power and will to fix whats wrong. THe UN cannot determinte who's a problem because they suck at it. 191 different opinions on something can really screw up the decision making process.
Heh, and I really hope Bush stop's ****ing bullying the living **** outta smaller countries. Let's see Bush try this bullshit with North Korea and see how long that lasts. ****, they have nukes right???
North Korea will hear from us on way or the other...as soon as we're done with Iraq.
-
August 31st, 2004, 06:36 PM
#62
Failure in leaving the war with way too many loose ends. Saddam was what obviously led Iraq into the trouble of the first Gulf War, and ensuring he wouldn't just up and do it again later meant removing him. We didn't remove him, and look what happened.
So, you rather wait till he's "dictator of the world" before doing anything about it? Wouldn't we all speak German now if that was the way to think?
You may have me beat on box uptimes, but I got ya on politics. C'mon, you know you want to give in to my overwhelmingly powerful Republican powers...mwahahaha....
-
August 31st, 2004, 06:50 PM
#63
Let's see Bush try this bullshit with North Korea and see how long that lasts. ****, they have nukes right
yeap, and thats why a lot of countries are rushing to get nukes too.
And thats why Israel will keep their Nukes and Iran will soon (if didnt got yet) nukes too.
They know that when someone become too big, the next phase is start to impose "their ideas" over the remaining world.... its called "imperialism"...
Those line of action just attract more angry against americans.... Attacking other countries with US HUGE army just turn bitter the US relationship with the rest of the world.
Please be aware that USA is not the only country on the world. Bush foreign politics wont help to get friends abroad.
Meu sítio
FORMAT C: Yes ...Yes??? ...Nooooo!!! ^C ^C ^C ^C ^C
If I die before I sleep, I pray the Lord my soul to encrypt. If I die before I wake, I pray the Lord my soul to brake.
-
August 31st, 2004, 06:52 PM
#64
"If that was the way to think", the US would be speaking Spanish, French, or British English; Europe would be speaking Latin, Spanish, Russian, or German. They've all been superpowers at one time, they all kicked everybody else's ass at one time. That "we would speak German now" argument is so hollow that it's ridiculous. And comparing Saddam's Iraq to those (ex-) superpowers is an insult to those countries
-
August 31st, 2004, 06:54 PM
#65
"If that was the way to think", the US would be speaking Spanish, French, or British English; Europe would be speaking Latin, Spanish, Russian, or German. They've all been superpowers at one time, they all kicked everybody else's ass at one time. That "we would speak German now" argument is so hollow that it's ridiculous. And comparing Saddam's Iraq to those (ex-) superpowers is an insult to those countries
ROFL...
Well some of us do speak Spanish, Russian and German....what does that make us?
-
August 31st, 2004, 06:58 PM
#66
I fail to see your point Neg, I'm afraid. It's not ridiculous because had we looked at Hitler as "well he's not dictator of the world and we're not the police" we WOULD be speaking German. In fact, we originally took that train of thought, didn't we? Then came Pearl Harbor, then suddenly a chang e of heart within US leadership.
We can't sit and wait until they get "powerful enough" to be a big threat before taking action. We hit him now before they get the chance to get that big.
And why is it no one cares that Saddam was literally taunting us for years, shooting down our planes and whatnot? I say we should've invaded long before any of this WMD fiasco broke out.
But maybe I'm just a war monger.
-
August 31st, 2004, 07:15 PM
#67
The bit that really makes me laugh about this is that all the screaming, "I hate America", I hate Bush" liberals that are so freely spitting their venom right now are going to have a really sucky next four years after Bush gets re-elected.........
The bit that's saddening is that all of you jumped in on JP's troll..... Why? Because he's "JP"? Silly little boys and girls..... Now get back to work......
Don\'t SYN us.... We\'ll SYN you.....
\"A nation that draws too broad a difference between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards, and its fighting done by fools.\" - Thucydides
-
August 31st, 2004, 07:28 PM
#68
No, because it's an interesting discussion and we like to decide for ourselves what discussions we partake in
-
August 31st, 2004, 07:45 PM
#69
The world doesn't hate America. A few powerful individuals hate the course of politics that directly affect them and they control your minds. Case and point:
Taliban removed from Afghanistan. So what? But powerful influences negate the good.
Saddam Hussein removed from power. Iraq still there. So what? Powerful influences negate the good.
Sudan is committing atrocities. So what? The powerful influences don't care.
North Korea is actively abusing nuclear treaties. So what? The influences at work benefit from notching power away from key governments.
Nothing secret or conspiratorial, just the tides of politics: 911 was the wrench that tipped the sail.
West of House
You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.
There is a small mailbox here.
-
August 31st, 2004, 07:53 PM
#70
Banned
I believe this poll is already up in Cosmos, but ...
I'm proudly mentally defective!
It's a good thing you can be proudly ignorant as well, ****tard. However, your vote was predictable because there is a direct correlation between intelligence and the number of ignorant posts made (for you, all of them). So you can go...
*ques up Rioter
DIE IN A FIRE!!!!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|