|
-
December 16th, 2004, 04:06 AM
#11
"I think the massive amount of potential loss that these defendants could have imposed was astounding, so that's what caused us to seek a substantial sentence against Mr. Salcedo," federal prosecutor Matthew Martens said.
You mean to say that they were caught before they did any damage and he still got 9 years ??!!!
-
December 16th, 2004, 04:28 AM
#12
Originally posted here by hypronix
[B]'tried to steal' this part is shaky to me.
i agree. that smells very "fishy" to me. so they didn't catch him red handed - otherwise they would have said he "was" stealing.
so what are we talking about here? does a port scan constitute an "attempt to steal"?
what are *you* going to do if a CIO says it does? i heard of CIO's who have no problem attempting to get you the electic chair if you attempt that sort of thing in their hospitals where they are charged with protecting patients' medical information. extreme ---> i think so!
but then again, they do pink slip doctors for breach of acceptable use policy.
-
December 16th, 2004, 04:30 AM
#13
gore
rapeists should be deballed...turned into a strumboni *spelling?*...then they deserve to be beaten almost to death with a very large painfull object....then droped into a pool of acid....you can tell who i hate more than Bush
drug dealers...drugs arnt good my friend...but its that persons life....he may do with it what he/she pleases....aslong as it isnt rape
work it harder, make it better, do it faster, makes us stronger
-
December 16th, 2004, 04:44 AM
#14
oo, don't get me started on the war against drugs. Biggest waste of tax money and prison space EVER. What the hell is the point of sending someone to prison for 10 years for having pot on them when right after they get released they go smoke again? Why even send them to prison for that long? Put them in rehab for 2 years, get them over the drug, give them 500 bucks (much cheaper than 8 years worth of food and heating we would pay them) so they don't start sellling again, and hope that they do the right thing.
[H]ard|OCP <--Best hardware/gaming news out there--|
pwned.nl <--Gamers will love this one  --|
Light a man a fire and you\'ll keep him warm for a day, Light a man ON fire and you\'ll keep him warm the rest of his life.
-
December 16th, 2004, 05:37 AM
#15
War on drugs? The only war on drugs is the war the government pulls over our eyes.
[soap box]
No, i dont think the US gov is out to get us. In fact i think they do a good job at keeping us nice and happy, by not letting us know the details.....I dont have proof, just my theory, but i think the government regulates the selling of drugs for profit, and makes a few 'big busts' here and there to make it seem as tho there is a war going on
[/soap box]
that being said...
9 years for unauthorized access, but no damage done (stealing the CC#'s or using them, or ident. theft) VS less than 9 years for raping or assault or robbery......
yea, theres something seriously wrong here.
its called money....
newayz, Im in no way supporting this dude, but im definatly against the 9 year sentance
-z3
-
December 16th, 2004, 11:16 AM
#16
-
December 16th, 2004, 11:26 AM
#17
there are other places, better suited for subversive chats and subversive actions.
Soviet russia?
*cha ching!*
I'll be here all night, and try out the rasberry punch over in the corner before you take to the floor gentlemen
-
December 16th, 2004, 11:32 AM
#18
Originally posted here by poohsuntzu
Soviet russia?
If you say so... nowhere is free, but someplaces there's a better illusion of freedom and privacy than in others.
However once Russia became a union of Soviets there was little subversive action... more in the lines of a paranoid dictator than anything else.
/  \\

-
December 16th, 2004, 04:29 PM
#19
Major companies who do not secure 802.11 wireless should have
their IT departments fired!!!
Running Netstumbler on a drive to the store shows how some
corp. IT departments are ignoring big holes in their networks.....
I guess security and 802.11 is an oxymoron.......
Another note: Your Dr's Office may also run unsecure 802.11 wi-fi.
Franklin Werren at www.bagpipes.net
Yes I do play the Bagpipes!
And learning to Play the Bugle 
-
December 16th, 2004, 05:34 PM
#20
Companies who don't secure their wireless network most likely do not have an IT department rahter it's someone running a cash register that wears the "IT" hat and thinks the package that says "secure wireless transfer" is accurate.
Maybe somebody else's life... after a sentence in a federal prison of this length it's not a lot that he'll be able to do IMO.
Kevin M. owns a security company and travels the world giving speeches. lol.
West of House
You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.
There is a small mailbox here.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|